The Marshall's Bunker! - Page 2

conmcb25 · May 8, 2003, 15:04

Quote:

Originally posted by FiGu
actually this is something that i haven't conquered.

Im just making some propaganda screenshots with (Cheats)

To inspire us all to VICTORY!

Shaka Naldur · May 8, 2003, 16:01

Quote:

Originally posted by FiGu
actually this is something that i haven't conquered.

Im just making some propaganda screenshots with (Cheats)

bad boy

greeny · May 8, 2003, 16:46

When it comes to taking Berlin comrade, I find 20+ Katyusha Rocket Launcher Divisions are the way to go!

(actual screenshot from my last game May/June 1944)

Colwyn · May 9, 2003, 18:37

Damn the nazi's killed my messenger, my requests for rush buys this turn is minimal, just cossacks in 1-2 cities if there not being build in one turn.

conmcb25 · May 9, 2003, 19:36

Quote:

Originally posted by Colwyn
Damn the nazi's killed my messenger, my requests for rush buys this turn is minimal, just cossacks in 1-2 cities if there not being build in one turn.

Which cities Comrade? I am god like (especially in my own mind

) but I do have a problem with mind reading!

Quickly Comrade the facists are at my door!

Colwyn · May 9, 2003, 19:54

Tula cossacks, Smolensk -airport(so we can airlift in during winter), bryansk - antitank, gomel build a labor brigade as it could be used to built a city in the pripayt marshes!

As curt is still to play you will find selling of libraries, banks etc will reap 1,000,000 rubles from the non front line cities, libs are pretty useless in most cities and size 1-4 cities don't need banks unless the plan for them is to be built up (not unless there are big resources near bye)

conmcb25 · May 9, 2003, 20:11

Roger that!

Ill start looking at the file tonight and depending upon the poll I may play as well!

Colwyn · May 10, 2003, 21:48

Bryansk - I thought it was me esp since the other front said to forget it and leave it to the enemy, may I have control of this one?

Gomel - who's is this now, it was abanded by the other front commander but my troops reinforced it and now occupy it. Its also the closest city to Smolensk.

Can you clarify

conmcb25 · May 10, 2003, 22:51

Quote:

Originally posted by Colwyn
Bryansk - I thought it was me esp since the other front said to forget it and leave it to the enemy, may I have control of this one?

Gomel - who's is this now, it was abanded by the other front commander but my troops reinforced it and now occupy it. Its also the closest city to Smolensk.

Can you clarify

I will look into this this evening.

I must say however that coordination has been lacking between you and the other guy.

I believe you and Shemir need to reflect and come to some kind of an understanding. If we are all going along our own paths the only victor will be the Facists!

I would look to Yopov and Henrikov, and there cooperation in the north saving Leningrad (under my astute leadership I might add). That has been the shining example of cooperative action that will ultimately defeat the Germans.

No man is an island comrades!

Except for me of course!

H Tower · May 10, 2003, 23:15

Quote:

Originally posted by conmcb25
No man is an island comrades!

Except for me of course!

An island of ego maybe

Shaka Naldur · May 11, 2003, 14:07

Quote:

Originally posted by Colwyn
Bryansk - I thought it was me esp since the other front said to forget it and leave it to the enemy, may I have control of this one?

Gomel - who's is this now, it was abanded by the other front commander but my troops reinforced it and now occupy it. Its also the closest city to Smolensk.

Can you clarify

as I said before I didn't know Kiev was going to hold for so long that's why I didn´t plan anything about Gomel and Bryansk

if you clame Gomel because there are some of your units over there I have to tell you that I was the one who reconquered Bryansk when it fall to the nazis
we should keep the fronts as they were in the beggining, but also, I would love to hear any sugestion you have for me

if Colwyn and me are not working together it is because we didn´t have the need to, IMHO
I built the cossacks in the cities west of the don river under my control to help the front once I saw I could hold the cinter through winter

as I said, if I would had known kiev was going to hold for so long I would had done lots of things in a different way (but I think my front is doing quite well anywas..)

Colwyn · May 11, 2003, 19:40

My troops will enjoy the pleasures of your cities hospitality

We've been doing ok so far together comrade, though I would suggest a barracks in Bryansk insteeed of units at the mo.

conmcb25 · May 11, 2003, 20:02

Good Im trying to promote working together.

Thanks!

Lets leave the Fronts as is right now.

But who controls partisans in the Pripyet? Colwyn has. If he continues it makes more sense for him to have at least Gomel.

Thoughts?

Shaka Naldur · May 12, 2003, 02:52

Quote:

Originally posted by conmcb25
Good Im trying to promote working together.

Thanks!

Lets leave the Fronts as is right now.

But who controls partisans in the Pripyet? Colwyn has. If he continues it makes more sense for him to have at least Gomel.

Thoughts?

I thought that the partisans weren't going to be control by front comanders but...

your units are more than welcome at gomel comrade

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 06:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaka Naldur

I thought that the partisans weren't going to be control by front comanders but...

your units are more than welcome at gomel comrade

Well Im asking the question, who is going to control them?

I thought I saw somewhere the Marshall, which might make sense since he plays after everyone else. But a Front commander can do it he just needs to play right before the Econ Minister/ Marshall Phase.

Thoughts?

greeny · May 12, 2003, 06:45

Because we are doing well, the partisans don't apper very far behind our front lines so in the interests of
Co-ordination with regular troops a nearby front commander should contol them. Then if in the future our frontline has moved so partisans are a long way behind enemy lines it would be more efficeient for the Marshall (plays last) to get contol of them them.

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 08:50

Quote:

Originally posted by greeny
Because we are doing well, the partisans don't apper very far behind our front lines so in the interests of
Co-ordination with regular troops a nearby front commander should contol them. Then if in the future our frontline has moved so partisans are a long way behind enemy lines it would be more efficeient for the Marshall (plays last) to get contol of them them.

Good point, Im beginning to think of you as my Marshall in Training! (And thats in a good way!

)

With this being said, Gomel goes to Colwyn as well as the Control of the Partisans in the Pripyat Marshes.

Shaka Naldur · May 12, 2003, 09:52

Quote:

Originally posted by conmcb25
With this being said, Gomel goes to Colwyn as well as the Control of the Partisans in the Pripyat Marshes.

I would like to know why
I don't mind giving him the partisans but the city is still at my front

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 10:42

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaka Naldur

I would like to know why
I don't mind giving him the partisans but the city is still at my front

Because that city will likely become a Partisan collection point. It will make the division of front responsibilities "cleaner".

Shaka Naldur · May 12, 2003, 12:53

I don't approve that marshall, the city is still mine

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 13:47

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaka Naldur
I don't approve that marshall, the city is still mine

No that city goes to Colwyn, if you dont like it get your Stavka together and Purge me.

Im starting to get a tad irritated with what I percieve as a me me me attitude from you.

This is a team effort and we are going to do what is best for the team.

Right now Gomel to Colwyn is the best solution because of its connection with the Marshes and the Partisans.

End of story.

Shaka Naldur · May 12, 2003, 14:06

Quote:

Originally posted by conmcb25

No that city goes to Colwyn, if you dont like it get your Stavka together and Purge me.

Im starting to get a tad irritated with what I percieve as a me me me attitude from you.

This is a team effort and we are going to do what is best for the team.

Right now Gomel to Colwyn is the best solution because of its connection with the Marshes and the Partisans.

End of story.

if it is a team effort I think the members of the team should be consulted before, if colwyn gets gomel and bryansk I would like to know where am I going, I will be stacked between colwyn and paul in a while, with no-where to move

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 14:10

I didnt say Bryansk, I said Gomel.

You still have Bryansk.

conmcb25 · May 12, 2003, 14:17

These are the two cities you have on the Don:Serafomovich and Voronezh

IF you get pushed back that far we will start assigning cities to you that are just east of there. And any new cities you build just East of the Don will be yours as well.

No one is trying to get rid of you. Im just trying to do what makes sense to counterattack the Germans.

I was thinking of deepening the Fronts anyway, I have to consult my military experts and then Ill get back with everyone.

Colwyn · May 24, 2003, 02:50

Are you using the modified rules.txt I posted a while back?

this is to fix the error where 6 shields are added to cities on plains in winter for those playing with the upgraded version of civ2 gold from FW etc.