May 15, 2003, 15:11
|
#1
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 01:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 27
|
Civ 3 Railroads
Is there anyway to modify Civ3 so that railroads are not infinite movement? I find this to be a severe problem in late game multiplayer and me and my friend would like to play the game how it used to be with railroads = 1/9 a movement. Its just too lame to be able to transfer your whole military across the continent, and makes sneaky transport landing practically worthless....
|
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2003, 15:42
|
#2
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 21:37
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
I think it is in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2003, 15:47
|
#3
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:37
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The First State
Posts: 446
|
No
I would rather have the ability to add a terrain improvement that is like a road with a different movement multiplier
__________________
Viva la Spam
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 04:17
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MOOHOOHO
Posts: 4,737
|
YuMMz , I think RR works that way to slow down conquest. You just have to plan your invasions in a different manner.
Have you played civ2? There you could use your enemys RR, AND units dropped from transport could attack the same turn. That made defending a long coastline almost impossible.
__________________
Don't eat the yellow snow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 05:11
|
#5
|
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 03:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 53
|
I think the rail roads are cool since they allow a unit to travel around the world for like 60000000000000000 times in a single turn which in the long run becomes intresting in the matter of Einstein's theory of relativity 
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 06:50
|
#6
|
|
Warlord
Local Time: 01:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
|
RRs could do with some serious tweaking indeed, one of my favourite scenarios from Civ II was WW2 ones. can't happen in Civ III with RRs as they are at present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 11:01
|
#7
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
|
hi ,
this has been asked before , .....
lets hope this tim they take it in account 
have a nice day
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 15:27
|
#8
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 03:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Republic of Flanders
Posts: 10,747
|
RR are the single worst aspect of this game and the time I start to loose interest in a game whether I'm winning or loosing. The whole strategy thing becomes a laugh, not more getting punished for mistakes, risks, nothing.
End RR now !!  
__________________
#There’s a city in my mind
Come along and take that ride
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right #
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 15:38
|
#9
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:37
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,551
|
Yes, it would be nice to be able to mod them.
__________________
Try peace first. If that does not work, then killing them is often a good solution. :evil:
As long as I could figure a way to hump myself, I would be OK with that
--Con
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2003, 16:37
|
#10
|
|
King
Local Time: 01:37
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
|
|
Quote:
|
|
RRs could do with some serious tweaking indeed, one of my favourite scenarios from Civ II was WW2 ones. can't happen in Civ III with RRs as they are at present.
|
RRs in Civ II work like Civ III, what's worse, you could use the enemy RR.
RR is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:37.
|
|
