Thread Tools
Old May 20, 2003, 11:57   #1
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Successful Archer Rush: Can You Lose Afterward?
Howdy,

The recent poll on your favorite standard units got me thinking. Nor Me and I both voted for the Archer as the "best" standard unit, simply because it wins games. My question is therefore:

If you successfully Archer rush a neighbor, is your game "in the bag", so to speak?

I would say yes. In recent (and maybe distant) memory, I cannot think of a game where I was successful in Archer-rushing my neighbor, but was forced to quit later on when obviously beaten. It seems to me like if you can "win the battle" early, you've also "won the war".

Note that I'm not saying Archer-rushes are always easy, nor are they always successful! There are many reasons why an Archer-rush is a bad idea, and why it would fail. For instance, Archer-rushes on Deity are pretty darn hard. Or, sometimes your neighbor is just too far for Archers to be really effective (although I've found that that is sometimes an advantage, as the AI's counter-attack is weaker).

So, my conclusion is that "rushes", like in almost any other war game (RTS, FPS, whatever) are really good in Civ3 too. Here are some reasons why I think this phenomenon is present in SP:

1. The AI is predictable in its defenses, and further its build queues. On Emperor, you can pretty much guess how many units an AI will muster to counter your Archer rush, and plan in consequence. Further, the AI, after a little expansion, will typically dedicate their best city to Wonder construction, regardless of military situation. What all this means is that you can incorporate an Archer rush into your gameplan without sacrificing too much on growth, because you know how many Archers you'll need. Against a human opponent, you need to sacrifice growth for conquest, which puts you behind the other more peaceful civs.

2. You get free techs from early conquest. People complain that you do not get a free tech when you conquer cities in Civ3. Big deal. What you get instead is all the civ's techs when you batter them down enough. The AI keeps on researching even if its being conquered, so you usually get a nice lump of techs for free. This is good because you do not have to trade for them with other civs, taking money and techs out of their pockets. One way to look at it is that you're translating 100-120 Shields (5-6 Archers) into (at least) 300+ Beakers. That's not a bad deal, considering that it's a "side effect" of conquest.

3. More room for expansion becomes available, in comparison to the AI civs. The ultimate point of Archer rushes is to claim more land for yourself. Notice that AI is coded to go to war to claim more land too. Where there is a discrepancy is when the AI chooses to claim more land militarily, in comparison to humans. The human player has the option (through Archer-rushes) to double or more his or her available land almost 50 or so turns before the AI gets the same idea. The Archer-rush is not a warmonger tactic, it's a builder one! Want a large, productive empire? Just take out your nearest neighbor and ride your land advantage to victory! True, the AI does sometimes "rush" early on, but these attempts lack focus, and therefore never achieve the same effect as possible for a human player. But consider KAI theory: those AIs which will emerge into killers are those which are able to take out their neighbors quickly. My toughest AI opponents have been those that have successfully (through favorable RNG outcomes) Archer-rushed their neighbor.

4. Alluded to above: the cost of conquest with Archer rushes is far far less than the relative cost of conquest at a later stage in the game. A strike force of five Archers takes almost no time to produce, yet alters the game the most. Twenty Cavalry can do some serious harm too, but nothing compared to five Archers. Since an Archer rush is so easy to set up and often so successful, the "cost of warfare" with it is much lower than at later stages.

5. (I actually forgot this one the first time around!) AIs are too easy to "control". Thus, when you leave your flanks or rear open by Archer-rusing in one direction, you need not fear because you can typically appease the other AIs long enough for you to complete your Archer rush (you can even bring them in on the action, if you sign an Alliance). In the games where I Archer-rush, my home cities are essentially undefended, while all my forces (Warriors and all) are wreaking havoc on my target. The other AIs, unlike human opponents, do not realise that I'm completely open, and would lose horribly if they just walked in and claimed my cities.

My advice is therefore simple: if you want to improve your game, master the Archer rush. You'll get to know when to use it, and when you do you will usually win. I consider this a "flaw" in the game, but such flaws always exist. Luckily this flaw is not emplyable in MP, where the defender can adapt to thwart the rusher's plans.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...

Last edited by Dominae; May 20, 2003 at 12:05.
Dominae is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:10   #2
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
Hmm. I don't often archer rush, at least not in the sense that I think you mean: building a bunch of archers and taking a big bite out of a neighbor.

I do, however, use archers to fight early wars, and actually kinda like it if the AI is relatively far away. I find this tends to work to my advantage. With a few archers & maybe a spearman, I can destroy all incoming AI forces while hardly skipping a beat in my REXing. Meanwhile, the AI continues to send out its standard settler teams (spearman/settler) during the "war" and I can pick them off, greatly hampering their expansion while helping mine.

This tends to work because the AI will send out archers in ones & twos without spearman protection. I can sit on a hill or mountain with several archers and nail their archers piecemeal. 2 attack vs. 1 defense, over and over.

I did this to great effect in my current game as Germany against the Russians, French and England. I took down 5 settler teams, captured 1 worker, gained another 2 in one of the peace deals, and generated 2 great leaders. The shield investment on my part was pretty low (though by the end of those little skirmishes, I had probably invested what you would invest in an early archer rush... I would guess that I built 8-10 archers total).

I've fought early archer wars on Emperor as well, and it seemed to just mean a few more archers coming at me.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:27   #3
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Quote:
Originally posted by Arrian
Hmm. I don't often archer rush, at least not in the sense that I think you mean: building a bunch of archers and taking a big bite out of a neighbor.
Arrian, what you describe is just a prelude to actually conquering your neighbor. A successful Archer rush will begin with either a Settler bop or an attack on a city. Then, you fortify your forces in defensible terrain and wait for the AIs counter-attack (it always comes). Once you've dealt with this (easy, because the AI does not have enough Roads yet and throws its Archers into the open), its an simple matter to finish off the job by taking all their cities. This last step is "simple" because the AI has sent everything it has to attack you; all that is left maximum a Spearmen or Warrior defending each city.

A subtle point is timing of the AIs construction of Archers for counter-attack: by noting when a city pushes out an Archer, you can calculate how long you have before another is built (modified by difficulty and land availalbe). If you do this well, there is rarely a need to bring any Spearmen along, since you'll never be defending.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:31   #4
Chemical Ollie
King
 
Chemical Ollie's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hooked on a feeling
Posts: 1,780
What you do in the ancient age will normally make you win or lose the game, and a successful AR is mostly a good start. However, I can think of some scenarios where the AR is not a game winner.

1) You share a remote continent with one more tribe. While the AR brings you forward, you are still on a remote island and have to do all the research on your own. The other AIs may be way ahead when you eventually make contact.

2) The AR might screw your reputation so that the whole world gangs up on you later. It put more strain on your diplomatic skills.
__________________
So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in - Supercitizen to stupid students
Lord know, I've made some judgement errors as a mod here. The fact that most of you are still allowed to post here is proof of that. - Rah
Chemical Ollie is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:35   #5
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
Good point. I never do that, btw (try to time the AIs archer production). Though it's kinda obvious if a small city just sent an archer out last turn.

I typically don't "go for the kill" with archers because I find that early in the game I end up autorazing too many AI cities. EDIT: and as Olaf points out, killing them off or seriously crippling them early may result in more research for you. I'd rather have 2 shots at getting tech (if there are lots of other civs around, though, maybe not). If I feel I can make a real play at taking their capitol & then play "follow the palace" that's one thing. But like I said, I often don't bring that many archers to the party. I'm fishing for slaves & GLs and thinking about a swordsman/horseman conquest later.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:47   #6
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Arrian, that's another way to do it. But I believe my point remains: if you exploit another civ in the way you describe, do you ever lose (forget UP for the moment)?

My own strategy is to take out the civ as quickly as possible (sometimes I wait a bit if they're nearing completion of a Wonder). What this allows me to do is: 1) REX with imputiny and set up an economy that the AI cannot rival, 2) proceed to the another civ with my still-useful Archers. Concerning the second point, the longer you wait with Archers, the less useful they become (this is obvious). So, if you really want to get the best bang for you buck with them, it's best to use them to take out multiple opponents. In my recent China game, I eliminated France and Persia with Archers, and took out most of India before Horsemen came online.

Olaf, I agree with your first point, but disagree with the second. Depending on the extent of your isolation, even a successful Archer rush may not put you over the top. But Reputation is not really a big deal. Just declare war, conquer their cities (never Raze) and you should not suffer any detrimental effects for the long run.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 12:58   #7
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
I'm not arguing against your central premise, Dominae. I'm just offering my method of using archers for comparison.

So yeah, I think your point remains.

How do you deal with autorazing, btw? Do you follow the capitol? What if you approach a size 2 city (without culture) and it dropped to 1 due to poprush, do you withdraw?

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 13:02   #8
Nor Me
Apolyton University
Prince
 
Local Time: 01:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 689
An oscillating war is better on a civ far away.
But if a civ is close enough, you gain a lot from capturing their cities early so I'd aim to take them out fast. It often only takes a small attack force to take their capital early if it's size 1 after building a settler.

If I'm planning to build, taking out the civ in 1 war without razing any cities is obviously better for reputation,cities and land. It just means you have to wait 10 turns for most cities.

I've never lost or even struggled after a successful archer rush. That might be due to never having a fairly successful archer rush on Deity though.
Nor Me is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 13:07   #9
Nor Me
Apolyton University
Prince
 
Local Time: 01:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally posted by Arrian
How do you deal with autorazing, btw? Do you follow the capitol? What if you approach a size 2 city (without culture) and it dropped to 1 due to poprush, do you withdraw?
If I actually want the city, I won't autoraze it. That does mean always following the capital and waiting 10 turns. If they have a size 2 city, they'll usually pop-rush in the end (if you plan on taking/razing it this war) so forcing it is only a bad idea if you want to kill more archers (for possible elites/GLs).
Nor Me is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 13:18   #10
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Quote:
Originally posted by Arrian
I'm not arguing against your central premise, Dominae. I'm just offering my method of using archers for comparison.
I knew that, I was just trying to drive the point home for the other readers...

Quote:
How do you deal with autorazing, btw? Do you follow the capitol? What if you approach a size 2 city (without culture) and it dropped to 1 due to poprush, do you withdraw?
If a city's time is up (i.e. I'm about to conquer it), auto-raze will not stop me. I've never felt that the later-game has been significantly tainted by an Archer-rush, Reputation-wise.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 16:30   #11
alexman
PtWDG Gathering StormCivilization IV CreatorsInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV PBEMApolyCon 06 Participants
Firaxis Games Software Engineer
 
alexman's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1998
Posts: 5,360
Archer rushes will win you the game if they succeed, no doubt. IF they succeed.

But even if you have a good chance of succeeding (which is often), depending on the map, you might have better chances of achieving Ultimate Power (TM) if you just wait for horsemen/swordsmen instead. There's a lot to be said about gifting Monarchy/Republic to an AI for all his money, and then attacking without him being able to pop-rush (or even rush) units.
alexman is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 16:40   #12
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
Quote:
There's a lot to be said about gifting Monarchy/Republic to an AI for all his money, and then attacking without him being able to pop-rush (or even rush) units.
If it's just you and them, I'd definitely agree. If there are lots of other AIs in contact with you & them, and they don't have the tech either, it's gonna get whored around, so it might not be worth it. If there are scientific civs around, and Monarchy helps them out of the ancient era, then you have feudalism getting out there, and that causes all sorts of trouble.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 16:43   #13
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
alexman returns to the Strat Forum! And the crowd rejoices!




Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 16:55   #14
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
And it was good.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 19:24   #15
peterfharris
GalCiv Apolyton Empire
Prince
 
peterfharris's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 350
Good thread, well put.

I have used very early Bab Bowmen rushes to good effect (put the game in the bag) but oddly never thought about doing the same with ordinary archers when playing some other civ. I instead wait for swordsmen. Those Bab Bowmen have been game busters a couple of times.

Umh, must try an archer rush, same attack as Bab Bowmen and same time period. Ooh, and archers don't trigger a despotic golden age.

A quick well executed archer war could often "put the game in the bag".

EDIT.
I did stuff up the first couple of games in which I tried this rush. Very bad idea for beginners to try this. Very good idea once you have the hang of the game.

Last edited by peterfharris; May 20, 2003 at 22:08.
peterfharris is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 22:32   #16
Frank Johnson
Civilization II MultiplayerDiploGamesCivilization IV: Multiplayer
King
 
Frank Johnson's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,261
I generally play normal sized maps, and for those I rarely find the far flung enemy cities to be of much interest in the early game where archers would be the dominate fighters. Now if the enemy is breathing down your neck, and sending out settlers into areas usable around your immediate capital, then by all means, slam them, but I usually there are iron or horses around, and I'm more worried about setting up my own cities, in my useable area, not picking on the AI.
Frank Johnson is offline  
Old May 20, 2003, 22:46   #17
peterfharris
GalCiv Apolyton Empire
Prince
 
peterfharris's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 350
Quote:
Originally posted by Frank Johnson
I generally play normal sized maps, and for those I rarely find the far flung enemy cities to be of much interest in the early game where archers would be the dominate fighters. Now if the enemy is breathing down your neck, and sending out settlers into areas usable around your immediate capital, then by all means, slam them, but I usually there are iron or horses around, and I'm more worried about setting up my own cities, in my useable area, not picking on the AI.
Ah, but a Bowman or Archer rush is great when you are squeezed for space (as on a tiny/small map).

I think anyone who has mastered the art of REXing (I haven't) would find this idea very useful when they are not boxed in even on a standard map so they can get hugely huge.
peterfharris is offline  
Old May 21, 2003, 11:48   #18
HazieDaVampire
King
 
HazieDaVampire's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The British Empire
Posts: 1,105
Re: Successful Archer Rush: Can You Lose Afterward?
Quote:
Originally posted by Dominae
It seems to me like if you can "win the battle" early, you've also "won the war".
Dominae
Civ3 lacks being able to 'turn the tides' of wars.
Unless sombody wishes to show me i'm wrong?
HazieDaVampire is offline  
Old May 21, 2003, 20:24   #19
Catt
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton University
King
 
Catt's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California - SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,120
I'd have to agree that a successful archer rush should ensue a win. Crippling a neighbor (or two!) and acquiring additional room for expansion can seal the game. For that very reason, I tend to not archer rush all that often -- I know it may not make much sense, but I just don't like winning the game in the ancient age.

Sometimes, of course, an archer rush is simply a requirement, as when the nasty Babylonians dare to block my expansionist Zulus from wider exploration.

Catt
Attached Thumbnails:
Click image for larger version

Name:	ai choke point.jpg
Views:	229
Size:	75.5 KB
ID:	45730  
Catt is offline  
Old May 21, 2003, 21:37   #20
Jaybe
Mac
Emperor
 
Jaybe's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Henderson, NV USA
Posts: 4,168
Quote:
Originally posted by Catt
... but I just don't like winning the game in the ancient age.

...
Yeah! Thank you for the validation, Catt!

I've always had problems declaring war so early. Actually, I have problems getting around to declaring war, PERIOD. Like many players, I suppose, I AM good at finishing a war someone ELSE declares!
Jaybe is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 04:46   #21
cumi
Warlord
 
cumi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 180
I have a few question about archer-rushes:
Dominae,

1. a. Are making archer-rush only too weaken you opponent or you are pushing settlers at the same time? I mean, do you start the war, when you really don't have space to expand or you do the preventivly? I mean, to weaken you neighbour once, so can expand in silent, while the AI tries to stand up again...

When I make an archer rush, I make a precise calculation before:

- How many new cities do I want to build?
- How many settlers/spearmen do I need for that?

In the most cases the FP will be also started in one of my new cities, so maybe I need more than one settler for that city.

- Which enemy cities do I want to keep/rize?
- Then the offense plan, like: x1, x2 armies against y1, y2 cities, later meeting at y3 city...

1.b. Do you also make a precise project plan like me? (and later you can see, if your attack was succesful or not)

2. When is the moment to start it? Taking in accout the answers for my 1st question.

3. ...and of course: When do you stop? When all of your archers are lost, or when you reached your previosly defined goal...

4. Do you build elite archers?
cumi is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 05:32   #22
cumi
Warlord
 
cumi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 180
Re: I have a few question about archer-rushes:
Quote:
Originally posted by cumi
4. Do you build elite archers?
I mean veteran, of course...
cumi is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 05:37   #23
trev
Civilization II Multiplayer
King
 
Local Time: 11:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,249
I use jags initially for exploration and generally make war with my first (closest) opponent and from that stage mostly build archers, and place ironworking into the research queue ( set science at 80 - 90%) - a high science rate is ok if most cities have no improvements.

Usually build at least 3 cities before I commence the first war.

I build settlers when cities approach size 5 generally as this avoids unhappiness (size dependant on number of luxury resources available) otherwise just build archers and later swordsmen until first civ wiped out

At this stage I turn myself into a builder as I have gained enough space to build a powerful civilisation.
trev is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 10:42   #24
Dominae
BtS Tri-LeaguePtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering StormApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
Dominae's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,017
Re: I have a few question about archer-rushes:
Quote:
Originally posted by cumi
1. a. Are making archer-rush only too weaken you opponent or you are pushing settlers at the same time?
Those are not exclusive. I do both simultaneously.

Quote:
I mean, do you start the war, when you really don't have space to expand or you do the preventivly? I mean, to weaken you neighbour once, so can expand in silent, while the AI tries to stand up again...
I do not expand until I've nowhere to expand anymore, then Archer rush to get more land. You need to harass the AI far before that (unless you're on a small peninsula or something; see The Power of Gold AU).

Quote:
When I make an archer rush, I make a precise calculation before:

- How many new cities do I want to build?
- How many settlers/spearmen do I need for that?
- Which enemy cities do I want to keep/rize?
- Then the offense plan, like: x1, x2 armies against y1, y2 cities, later meeting at y3 city...
I'm not so precise in battle plans. I guess it just comes from experience. Here is generally what I do, and what works for me on Emperor as a Militaristic civ (starting from Turn 1):

1. One Warrior for exploration
2. One Archer for exploration
3. Settler or Granary, depending on my mood
4. Between Settlers/Workers, an Archer whenever I can.
5. A couple of new cities build Barracks and Warriors/Archers.

At around step 3 I've found a neighboring AI. I patrol around their lands to get some intel, and wait for a Settler/defender combo (a stack of two Workers is good too). Then I attack this juicy target. Sometimes I'll do this with only 2 Archers and 1 Warriors in my entire army. That's fine: the AI counter-attacks very poorly at this stage. Captured Workers beeline for my capital (of course).

This is key: I then wait around on high ground for counter-attackers, and pick these off with Archers. You've "conquered" another AI civ if you destroy its standing army. If ever the AI's forces threaten my settlements (which sometimes happens), I'll delay as long as possible, then offer Peace. They usually accept. Once I get 5-6 Vet. Archers up and running, I take down that first civ, and proceed to the next, all the while building Settlers and Workers in high-Food cities.

Quote:
...and of course: When do you stop? When all of your archers are lost, or when you reached your previosly defined goal...
I stop when either: 1) the AI puts up too much of a resistance, and it would start threatening my cities in a counter-attack, or 2) that civ is more or less gone, at which point I proceed to the next target.

Looking at your version of the strat, I think you build too many Spearmen when you could just be building more Archers. Forget about defense: you're the aggressor, so why do you need Spearmen defending your cities? Barbs are annoying, which is why Warriors are an important build between Workers and Settlers.


Dominae
__________________
And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...
Dominae is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 12:20   #25
lmtoops
PtWDG LegolandCivilization III Democracy GameCivilization III PBEMCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
lmtoops's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,209
Dominae has a good point concerning spearmen. If you need mp, use warriors and then have warrior or archers monitoring the fog for barbs. Maybe a few spearmen for border towns, but that it.
lmtoops is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 13:32   #26
vmxa1
PtWDG Gathering StormC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
vmxa1's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
I do pretty much the same way. I will always jump on my nearest civ when I run across a settler stack. Once that happens I will sent a stream of archers or something to take down the nearest and hopefully the capitol.
I paly with no respawn, one your done, you are done.
If this is not enough to eliminate a civ, I will come at them later with horses.
All the while I am trying to expand as this tends to occur when I have only a few cities. What stops it is they get too many units and I have captured one or more cities and have to hold them. I am usually at war with one than one by then. Either they get help or I have been force to whack another civs units.
I just feel that it is more fun to attack and it hurts them badly. The two or three civs that I fought early are going to be at the bottom of the curve with all the losses they incur.
I do this at Mon or Emp. At deity I will take more care to not have more than one foe at a time.
vmxa1 is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 14:54   #27
bongo
lifer
PtWDG2 Mohammed Al-SahafPtWDG Neu DemogypticaCivilization III PBEMC3CDG Blood Oath HordeIron CiversC4DG The HordeC4WDG éirich tuireann
Emperor
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MOOHOOHO
Posts: 4,737
Slightly OT but when you're about to attack a spearman/settler combo, do you declare war first or just attack right away?
__________________
Don't eat the yellow snow.
bongo is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 15:30   #28
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
I always formally declare.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 17:04   #29
cumi
Warlord
 
cumi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:58
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 180
Dominae,

did I understand you correctly: you are attacking sometimes with 1 worrior and 2 archer? Wow... Usually I am loosing this size of "army" against a single spearman.

What you described, are very aggressive playstile - as I understad - . How do you handle this with diplomacy? What do the other civs say?

I also think, that I am planing, waiting etc too long with my aggressions. I always want to be a perfectionist. It seems like, there is no need for this. Simply, for me buildig a military unit, is the last thing... If I can buld for examle a marketplace in a city, I will start it and NOT a millitary unit. Bad.... I am too much builder...

cumi
cumi is offline  
Old May 22, 2003, 17:09   #30
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:58
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
I can't speak for Dominae, but I often attack with 1 archer, maybe with 1 warrior in support.

Then again, I'm not looking to conquer with that force. I'm looking to take out a settler team, steal the civ's worker, and do as much damage as I can without getting hurt. I also want to get my archer promoted to elite (if I haven't managed that already via battles with barbs) & fish for a leader.

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:58.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team