Thread Tools
Old May 27, 2003, 15:40   #31
eris
Prince
 
eris's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 407
Many of the annoying things my own AI (governers. workers, etc) does I put down to an accurate simulation of the "People are stupid" effect that bogs down all human organizations. This problem has plagued leaders of all sorts throughout the ages. Civ III has wonderfully simulated that effect. In fact, for gameplay purposes, this becomes a reason NOT to micromanage, as you get to repeatedly ask the question that leaders often ask, "What did you do THAT for?".

Others have griped about the intrusion into one's territory issue and the double standard in that play. That is irritating that the AI gets to play by different rules on that issue.

The one that really gets to me is during REX. My scouts find a perfect place for a faraway city, something with bonus and resources or luxuries or whatever, a real good place to put the FP or at least establish a border. My settler/spearman pair works its way across the terrain, gets to the distant promised land, and just as they get there some foreign settler/spearman pair shows up out of the fog, has a one turn jump on us and beats us to that perfect spot. Usually I have to back off and take some second-rate position to establish border, etc. It is not a "bug" or anything, it is just a case of the AI playing well enough to drive me crazy. Sometimes I have started wars over it, not even at the best of times to start the war, just an immediate reaction to the nasty sly little trick the AI has just played. My reaction is deliberately hyped up for role playing purposes, but still, that can be so annoying that I offer it as my addition to this thread's content.

-Eris
__________________
If you aren't confused,
You don't understand.
eris is offline  
Old May 27, 2003, 15:53   #32
Darknes_of_Mind
Settler
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1
Maybe its just me, but moreso then the fact the AI can wander through your territory whenever it feels like it, i HATE when they bring a settler in, just to build a city in some little tiny gap in your borders in the middle of your empire. Often only to have the city flip, it is an annoying thing.

Also, when they bring units into your territory, and you demand them to leave once, and they dont, so you demand them to leave again, and they automatically jump to the spot they were going, on the other side of your borders, sometimes in the middle of your empire in that little whole, where they were going anyways, to build their damned city.


I think the auto remove feature, shouldnt move it to the closest unowned land, but should move units to the closest available space on THEIR side of the border.

Darknes_of_Mind is offline  
Old May 27, 2003, 16:44   #33
TheArsenal
Apolyton University
Prince
 
TheArsenal's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally posted by Randolph
Failure to annex neighboring (AI) civs!! A huge AI civ will sit next to a much smaller civ for ages, when it should completely annex them. Even when they go to war they never finish the job. In fact it should be more difficult in general to get the AI to make peace.
On larger maps (and more civs) the game is basically over after you annex 2-3 other civs. Since the AI is so passive you're then twice the size of any other civ. This isn't a game you can win by just waiting in line to get killed.
Passive AI? I don't find that to be true. Sure, I played one game some weeks ago where right after Chivalry two civs were left as single cities on other continents, and the big AI civs let them live until I won by SS. But that was the first and only time I'd seen that. In most games, mine anyway, the AIs are rampaging destroyers of other civs. A few game back, I watched every civ on the planet (nine) take on the biggest nation in the game (and game point leader the Mongols) and go at them until they were no more. Certainly, the AI will stop wars sooner than I would, but start them up again sooner too (before 20 turns peace expires. Often the very turn after peace), and if it smells blood in the water - forget it - it will maul that civ.
__________________
"Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription is ... more cow bell!"
TheArsenal is offline  
Old May 27, 2003, 17:37   #34
mrboo123
Rise of Nations MultiplayerC4DG VoxCiv4 SP Democracy GameNationStates
King
 
mrboo123's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,716
In my games, the AI ALWAYS plant forset ALL over there nation! And have city size of 1 or 2!
__________________
Former President, Vice-president and Foreign Minister of the Apolyton Civ2-Democracy Games as 123john321
mrboo123 is offline  
Old May 27, 2003, 19:28   #35
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Quote:
Originally posted by Darknes_of_Mind
Maybe its just me, but moreso then the fact the AI can wander through your territory whenever it feels like it, i HATE when they bring a settler in, just to build a city in some little tiny gap in your borders in the middle of your empire. Often only to have the city flip, it is an annoying thing.

Also, when they bring units into your territory, and you demand them to leave once, and they dont, so you demand them to leave again, and they automatically jump to the spot they were going, on the other side of your borders, sometimes in the middle of your empire in that little whole, where they were going anyways, to build their damned city.


I think the auto remove feature, shouldnt move it to the closest unowned land, but should move units to the closest available space on THEIR side of the border.

You ever see "Bridge Over the River Kwai"?

Remember at the end, when the young British commando (Jeffrey Horne... I know his name as he is going to be my brother-in-law) is waiting to blow the bridge, and Alec Guiness and the Japanese general are tracking the cord down the river?

And William Holden and the older British commando start yelling?

KILL HIM!! KILLL HIMMM!!! KILLLL HIMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get the idea?
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 00:33   #36
ALPHA WOLF 64
Prince
 
ALPHA WOLF 64's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally posted by eris
The one that really gets to me is during REX. My scouts find a perfect place for a faraway city, something with bonus and resources or luxuries or whatever, a real good place to put the FP or at least establish a border. My settler/spearman pair works its way across the terrain, gets to the distant promised land, and just as they get there some foreign settler/spearman pair shows up out of the fog, has a one turn jump on us and beats us to that perfect spot. Usually I have to back off and take some second-rate position to establish border, etc. It is not a "bug" or anything, it is just a case of the AI playing well enough to drive me crazy.
i've noticed that this happens too frequently when I put my settler on an auto path to a location. no matter how far away it seems to be from the other civs, someone will get there 1 turn before i do. i wonder if this illustrates that the AI knows your moves that are planned out beyond the current turn.
ALPHA WOLF 64 is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 03:51   #37
bongo
lifer
PtWDG2 Mohammed Al-SahafPtWDG Neu DemogypticaCivilization III PBEMC3CDG Blood Oath HordeIron CiversC4DG The HordeC4WDG éirich tuireann
Emperor
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MOOHOOHO
Posts: 4,737
Do you suggest that civ3 has mind-reading capabilities?

An alternative solution is that the AI, given it's excellent map-reading skills has seen that spot already and simply beats you to it? After all, you will never notice when YOU beat the AI to that nice spot.
__________________
Don't eat the yellow snow.
bongo is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 10:16   #38
Randolph
Civilization III Democracy GameC4DG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityPtWDG Gathering StormC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Prince
 
Randolph's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally posted by TheArsenal


Passive AI? I don't find that to be true. Sure, I played one game some weeks ago where right after Chivalry two civs were left as single cities on other continents, and the big AI civs let them live until I won by SS. But that was the first and only time I'd seen that. In most games, mine anyway, the AIs are rampaging destroyers of other civs. A few game back, I watched every civ on the planet (nine) take on the biggest nation in the game (and game point leader the Mongols) and go at them until they were no more. Certainly, the AI will stop wars sooner than I would, but start them up again sooner too (before 20 turns peace expires. Often the very turn after peace), and if it smells blood in the water - forget it - it will maul that civ.
Very interesting. I promise I'm not talking out of my ass, or about a single game. A few times I've had multiple AI s attack me at once after I've become powerful, but that can almost always be avoided with some diplomacy. I've certainly never felt my existence is challenged after I've annexed a civ or two. (BTW I play almost exclusively on emperor, so I don't think it's due to low difficulty)

Do you think it could be based on the player style? I have noticed AI vs AI wars are much more common after I've had a few wars myself. I tend to have very short (well prepared for), and decisive wars; maybe this leads to less worldwide strife? I also play MODs almost all the time (generally double your pleasure, or the ancient Mediterranean), but although I could see how that might make the AI use individual units less efficiently, I don't see how it could make the AI less aggressive.

cronos_qc: I'll try that
Randolph is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 15:24   #39
I Am Jeff
Civilization III Democracy Game
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 22:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 75
After an AI civ on another land mass declares war on me, it sends like 1 ship with 1-3 units on it and lands on me. And then it does this for a few turns before it gives up, with minimal losses to myself.

For example in my current game, I am about 1.5 times larger then the enemy civ and it declares war on me because I would not give them incense (that is another annoyance). So they send a Galleon with 3 units on it + an Ironclad. Then next turn they send another group like that. So you see every 6-7 spaces one of these groups. This leads to weak attacks because it can not coordinate the attack with all of its units. Furthermore, I am on a continent and they are to the East of me. They travel about 15 squares south, then like 20 West, and then another 10 north before they land. All the while I have my ironclads picking off their ships as they go by and when it is all over they landed less then 10 units over like 6 turns.

Another thing was with trading. In order to get the tech nationalism, they wanted Electricity, world map, about 800 gold, and about 225 gold per turn. Under any circumstances this is unacceptable and stupid. I could see maybe 2 techs for their one, or their tech for my tech and lump some of gold. BUT GEEZ, 225 gold per turn is outrageous.

My other grievances have been listed like the bunch of old units, the trespassing (to fix this I set up a sting of units so they can not get by), the lack of gold the AI keeps or the fact that the AI has like 10000 gold (I still do not know how they do that by the middle ages), the lack of artillery use, etc. etc.
I Am Jeff is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 18:34   #40
dexters
Apolyton Storywriters' Guild
King
 
dexters's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally posted by bongo
Do you suggest that civ3 has mind-reading capabilities?

An alternative solution is that the AI, given it's excellent map-reading skills has seen that spot already and simply beats you to it? After all, you will never notice when YOU beat the AI to that nice spot.
Bongo has a point. It's called selective memory. You remember only what want to remember to fit a theory.

But I must say, I've noticed the "AI settling in a spot" before you get there.

Perhaps someone can try not using autopath and move their settler teams turn by turn. See if the AI still chooses the spots.
dexters is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 18:46   #41
TheArsenal
Apolyton University
Prince
 
TheArsenal's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 900
Quote:
But I must say, I've noticed the "AI settling in a spot" before you get there.

Especially if you are the first to find an island and need a few turns to get a settler a come back. Guaranteed the AI settles there before you get back.
__________________
"Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription is ... more cow bell!"
TheArsenal is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 18:48   #42
Panag
MacCivilization II Democracy Game: ExodusC4BtSDG Rabbits of Caerbannog
Emperor
 
Panag's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally posted by TheArsenal



Especially if you are the first to find an island and need a few turns to get a settler a come back. Guaranteed the AI settles there before you get back.
hi ,

well the AI can see the whole map completely with all resources and all before you do , .....

have a nice day
Panag is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 19:12   #43
dexters
Apolyton Storywriters' Guild
King
 
dexters's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally posted by TheArsenal



Especially if you are the first to find an island and need a few turns to get a settler a come back. Guaranteed the AI settles there before you get back.
I really don't know about that since I don't play enough archipelago games.

But I think you fail to give the AI credit. The AI is very good at exploring. Because it is a computer program, it is very thorough with it too.

And yes, AI has an idea of where landmasses are, and where resources are. Although they can't see it until they have the right techs to use those resources.
dexters is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 19:23   #44
Roggan
Chieftain
 
Roggan's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30
AND IT SAYSD
GOT OUT ON NOT U TEROGITY
HEHE

AS IT NOT MINE TEROGITY
Roggan is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 19:24   #45
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
I have an idea of where the landmasses are, so why shouldn't the comp? Just looking at my own continent/island, I can often tell where nearby islands will be.

Also, has anyone proven that the AI knows where the resources are? Couldn't it just be stupid enough to settle in bad terrain a lot, so it gets lucky a lot more often?
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 19:40   #46
dexters
Apolyton Storywriters' Guild
King
 
dexters's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally posted by skywalker
I have an idea of where the landmasses are, so why shouldn't the comp? Just looking at my own continent/island, I can often tell where nearby islands will be.

Also, has anyone proven that the AI knows where the resources are? Couldn't it just be stupid enough to settle in bad terrain a lot, so it gets lucky a lot more often?
Watch a debug game and you will see it settles near resources. (in debug, you see all resources)

But it won't link the resource with roads until it can use it, unless of course a road just happens to go over a resources it can't use.

It may be that the leader AI sees the resources, but the worker unit AIs and the city AIs can't. So they are told to settle in a spot by the leader, without a clue why since they can't see the resources.
dexters is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 20:29   #47
Shogun Gunner
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton Storywriters' GuildCivilization III Democracy GameCall to Power II MultiplayerCall to Power MultiplayerC3CDG Team BabylonPtWDG Vox ControliCivilization IV CreatorsC4DG Sarantium
Emperor
 
Shogun Gunner's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Potomac Falls, Virginia
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally posted by bongo
The AI doesn't have the slightest clue on how to use any form of artillery effectively. A possible exception is naval bombardment, it's not good at it, not really, but better than decent, sort of...

Imagine a learning AI that not only learns from it's mistakes but connects to the internet to exchange strategies with other AI's. They may even get their own forum here at apolyton
Now that's a great idea!!!!!
Shogun Gunner is offline  
Old May 28, 2003, 22:25   #48
mrboo123
Rise of Nations MultiplayerC4DG VoxCiv4 SP Democracy GameNationStates
King
 
mrboo123's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,716
Quote:
Originally posted by dexters


Watch a debug game and you will see it settles near resources. (in debug, you see all resources) (...)
What a "debug" game?
__________________
Former President, Vice-president and Foreign Minister of the Apolyton Civ2-Democracy Games as 123john321
mrboo123 is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 00:06   #49
Louis XXIV
C4WDG Stratega
Prince
 
Louis XXIV's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The First State
Posts: 446
Quote:
It may be that the leader AI sees the resources, but the worker unit AIs and the city AIs can't. So they are told to settle in a spot by the leader, without a clue why since they can't see the resources.
Maybe the AI is planning to settle in areas that are likely to have a resource. Probably not, though

Quote:
What a "debug" game?
Debug mode lets you see everything. So you know what the AI is doing (I think it is PTW only)
__________________
Viva la Spam
Louis XXIV is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 00:37   #50
ALPHA WOLF 64
Prince
 
ALPHA WOLF 64's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally posted by bongo
Do you suggest that civ3 has mind-reading capabilities?

An alternative solution is that the AI, given it's excellent map-reading skills has seen that spot already and simply beats you to it? After all, you will never notice when YOU beat the AI to that nice spot.
There's no mind reading involved, once you tell a unit to go to a distant spot, the AI could easily be aware of your intentions. The AIs to me seem to expand their immediate borders unless there's a resource they want. However, I am talking more about spots that have no significant resources nor strategic locations but spots that I wanted that would satisfy some specifc need of mine, usually a distant "colony" that I wil use to populate an undeveloped area.

As far as islands go, i think the Ai knows what you know even if you dont sell your maps. Example: while testing some mod changes, i will use the same map so I can see how changes affect the game play. On the map is an island that is closer to 3 AIs than I am. In the games that I explore the area first, the Ais will always settle it. In games that I meander a settler up there, the island is always empty. If i autopath a ship/settler to the island without discovering it, its a coin flip whether the AI is already there or not. Since most of my games are similar in strategy and play, I always get there around the same time each game.

Last edited by ALPHA WOLF 64; May 29, 2003 at 00:47.
ALPHA WOLF 64 is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 08:25   #51
mrboo123
Rise of Nations MultiplayerC4DG VoxCiv4 SP Democracy GameNationStates
King
 
mrboo123's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,716
Quote:
Originally posted by Louis XXIV
(...)Debug mode lets you see everything. So you know what the AI is doing (I think it is PTW only)
Cool, where is it? I have3 PtW
__________________
Former President, Vice-president and Foreign Minister of the Apolyton Civ2-Democracy Games as 123john321
mrboo123 is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 08:42   #52
VJ
King
 
VJ's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,247
Quote:
But the AI habit that drives me nuts is blithely thinking they can send troops across my territory whenever they damned well feel like it
Yep.

You can demand them to stay away, but they don't seem to like it much, and it gets annoying that you have to repeat the same mantra every turn, "leave my territory at once!"...
VJ is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 09:10   #53
Arrian
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?
Deity
 
Arrian's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
I like AI settler teams. They're yummy.

What irritates me more than anything else, despite the fact that I understand why it works this way, is the markup the AI charges you if you're bigger than they are for luxury trades. I'm just finishing up a great game as Germany, and I wanted to trade for Carthiginian Wine. So I offered: 7 luxuries, 1 strategic resource, 1 tech. They laughed at me. So I sent my Panzers to "negotiate."

-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Arrian is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 09:23   #54
vulture
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Mohammed Al-SahafC4DG Gathering Storm
King
 
vulture's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1,257
The AI doesn't have any benefit over you sending settlers across your territory. You can demand they leave just as easily as they can demand you leave their territory (leave or declare war...) You just have to be as prepared to go to war over it as the AI is. And, as Arrian says, those settler teams can either be viewed as a nice source of slaves early in the game (it'd cost you 230 gold or so to buy 2 slaves in PtW), or you can let them found a hopelessly corrupt city that has no defence, and take it when it gets to size 2.

If you aren't prepared to defend yourself violently, then the AI will walk all over you. You'd do the same to it if it was so placid.
vulture is offline  
Old May 29, 2003, 21:21   #55
peterfharris
GalCiv Apolyton Empire
Prince
 
peterfharris's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 350
There are two things I find particularly irritating.
1. Given the crucial importance of tech trading I would love to have a pop-up to inform me when another civ has discovered a new tech to save me the tedium of constantly ringing everyone to see if they any fancy new discoveries.
2. Why is the AI agree to absurd alliances. It may be virtually defenceless and declare anyway voiding its trade agreements. (Worst case I ever saw was in a game where I found the Babs had been reduced to a settler on a boat. I got into a war with the French who had taken over all the Bab cities. Over the course of some ten turns I gave them former Bab cities 5 cities, a dozen techs, some money, gifted two luxuries and iron. The Babs joined an alliance with France. They DOWed me even though their military forces came to the grand total of one warrior, one spearman and a galley with four undefended cities which I could reach with cavalry in a single turn. There is something seriously wrong in the diplomacy AI.
peterfharris is offline  
Old May 30, 2003, 03:38   #56
bongo
lifer
PtWDG2 Mohammed Al-SahafPtWDG Neu DemogypticaCivilization III PBEMC3CDG Blood Oath HordeIron CiversC4DG The HordeC4WDG éirich tuireann
Emperor
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MOOHOOHO
Posts: 4,737
The AI do have some built-in restrictions on it's map-knowlegde. In my current game(pangea map) I found an island some distance from the mainland but close enough to reach with galleys(coastal tiles all the way) I stopped before any land-tiles were visible which stopped the AI from sending settlers there. When I finally sent a galley all the way to the island and exchanged maps with the AI, that island were 'swarming' with settlers almost instantly.
__________________
Don't eat the yellow snow.
bongo is offline  
Old May 30, 2003, 05:14   #57
Daz
Prince
 
Daz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Deaf forever
Posts: 599
I hate it when the ai builds cities on every possible, available tile, no matter now bad the position is. I mean in the middle of tundra, no problem! City can grow max to size 2: no problem.... Its so annoying...
Daz is offline  
Old May 30, 2003, 08:07   #58
LaRusso
King
 
LaRusso's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: appendix of Europe
Posts: 1,634
until tanks are discovered, you have to deal with pillage attrition war of massive arty bombardment and stacks of infantry ravaging the communications. AI just sits helplessly when i maneuvre big stacks of infantry, cutting communications, then firing 5+ arty salvos and reducing their cities to rubble. then i sacrifice a couple of infantry and take the city. AI is very poor in maneuvring its defensive arty to counter such incursions...
__________________
joseph 1944: LaRusso if you can remember past yesterday I never post a responce to one of your statement. I read most of your post with amusement however.
You are so anti-america that having a conversation with you would be poinless. You may or maynot feel you are an enemy of the United States, I don't care either way. However if I still worked for the Goverment I would turn over your e-mail address to my bosses and what ever happen, happens.
LaRusso is offline  
Old May 30, 2003, 19:06   #59
dexters
Apolyton Storywriters' Guild
King
 
dexters's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:24
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally posted by peterfharris
There are two things I find particularly irritating.
1. Given the crucial importance of tech trading I would love to have a pop-up to inform me when another civ has discovered a new tech to save me the tedium of constantly ringing everyone to see if they any fancy new discoveries.
2. Why is the AI agree to absurd alliances. It may be virtually defenceless and declare anyway voiding its trade agreements. (Worst case I ever saw was in a game where I found the Babs had been reduced to a settler on a boat. I got into a war with the French who had taken over all the Bab cities. Over the course of some ten turns I gave them former Bab cities 5 cities, a dozen techs, some money, gifted two luxuries and iron. The Babs joined an alliance with France. They DOWed me even though their military forces came to the grand total of one warrior, one spearman and a galley with four undefended cities which I could reach with cavalry in a single turn. There is something seriously wrong in the diplomacy AI.
I think this is one of the more glaring shortcomings of the game.

Diplomacy requires the management and interpretation of a rival/friend's actions and intentions. The computer is obviously not a human and cannot interpret actions. They can only take the results and adjust their perspective based on a defined formula. As far as I know, there are really only two diplomacy related sliders. Attitude and Reputation.

I also know the AI do have some kind of threat assesment mechanism it keeps hidden from the player. The AI is also capable of measuring allied contributions in a war. All this does is affect the Attide and Reputation sliders. What is lacking is for the AI to have the capacity to distinguish between historical allies, and other types of Civs.

It is frustrating for human players to find themselves faced with an ungrateful AI despite all the help they've lent the AI. I think a third slider, the Friendship slider should be included hopefully in the new XP. Friendship sliders measure historical trade relations, gold lend during war, and hopefully, weighs actions such as returning of conquered cities in the equation.

Right now, the major downside with sliders is that it is essentially a "natural state" slider that is modified by human actions. You Do A, slider gets modified with +1. You do B, slider is modified with -2 etc. There needs to be some kind of calculation going behind the numbers to allow for quantification of more complex actions and weigh the relative goodness of actions. A human player lending substantial gold when the AI is at war should be valued highly. A human player giving away useless pop 1 cities that are far away and difficult to defend may be even valued negatively, as a kind of insult to the AI.

Additonal Notes

On a related note, one of the things that the AI appears to lack is any conception of space. Now, Soren has said that AI doesn't play with a monitor or a keyboard. It obviously doesn't see the game like a human player sees it. Their empire is probably just a list of cities and certain coded instructions will lead to certain actions. Fair enough.

But the AI also have at its disposal the mathematical power of the computer and I would think it would be capable of clustering cities. Cities within a unified border would be clustered as a single "entity" a kind of province as humans would see it. This would allow the AI to manage its civilization a little differently. The core clusters, the motherland, so to speak, would receive priority. Any outsides colonies would be managed as such. If the AI can cluster cities, it could be possible to then program it to plan for acquisitions of foreign cities, protection of its other clusters (say island colonies) against a rival civ's city on the same island.

Cluster management would therefore allow the AI some semblance of strategic planning beyond maximization of cities and power, which to me, appears to be the driving force behind the AI. While not flawed, these instructions tend to let the AI meander aimless through thr game, with no strategic goal. The AI ought to be able to recognize for example that it wants to expand Cluster B. And gear for a war against a civ in that region. It would then examine each Civ, friendly civs maybe eliminated early, powerful civs may be eliminated, and it may come to a conclusioon that at this time it can't attack. And pursue an alternate plan. Say, ask for an alliance against a third civ. Or delay attack until later, after a military build up. These strategic plans can be modified every 5, 10 turns.

What we get is a more human like AI. The AI will shift strategic focus from point to point throughout the game. I think it would make for a superb experience. Because now, it is not just about maximization of AI power, but you have to worry where its going to come from. Wehre will the AI decided to expand.

It will lead to less of that pointless war mongering when the AI is reduced to one city, and still declares war on a powerful enemy. I don't get that. I think it's a fundamental faliure in the current AI that has been ignored. My fear is that the AI is just not built to handle modifications like I hope they would do. But With the set alliance system being proposed for Conquests, the AI diplomacy needs a nice bump. If anyone at Firaxis is reading this they should take note. I hope they do it.

Last edited by dexters; May 30, 2003 at 19:33.
dexters is offline  
Old May 31, 2003, 03:44   #60
~OmegaRed~
Settler
 
~OmegaRed~'s Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:24
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Bend, IN & San Diego, CA
Posts: 22
God damn unfair diplomacy.

Fair exchange of maps? NO!
their map for my map +literature/monarchy/engineering/my first born/my left leg = maybe
~OmegaRed~ is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:24.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team