May 31, 2003, 19:21
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 551
|
I have no idea how to place my defenses
I have never really thought about how I'm supposed to lay out the defenses of my nation. I have always just put extra amounts of garrisoned units in border cities. When the AI tries to bypass the cities to go to the heart of my nation and pillage improvements I just send my units to defend the spaces in between cities. I like using forts, but I never can use them well. They take a while to build. In this one game I built this huge wall of fortresses along my border with Greece, each with three MI and 1 artillery. They were a stronger civ than me. I went to war with them but I got everyone else in the world on my side (that's my trademark, I fight little but when I do fight I always win even if I'm small because I enlist the aid of all the other civs) and I captured some of their cities, and my line of fortresses wasn't even on the border at all anymore.
Some people talk of creating traps using fortresses, but I have no idea how to create a trap.
If you won't tell me some strategies could you please post a link to a good thread on this topic.
__________________
"The first man who, having fenced off a plot of land, thought of saying, 'This is mine' and found people simple enough to believe him was the real founder of civil society. How many crimes, wars, murders, how many miseries and horrors might the human race had been spared by the one who, upon pulling up the stakes or filling in the ditch, had shouted to his fellow men: 'Beware of listening to this imposter; you are lost if you forget the fruits of the earth belong to all and that the earth belongs to no one." - Jean-Jacques Rousseau
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2003, 22:02
|
#2
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
I finally realized in that game you posted that those were fortresses. I had never built one in all the civ games I have played from Chief to Deity. So I would say they are not a wise investment, except on rare circumstances. Yes they can be useful, but not required.
It is not hard to figure out the Ai and it tactics, so you can get away without troops in all cities, once you get out of despostism. I like to get mobile troops ASAP (horses) and road my cities. This lets me defend with less. Once you get RR up it is a cake wall to defend.
Try to funnel their troops in a kill zone. This can be done by leaving a hole in their approach path and having bombardment units to hurt them.
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2003, 22:24
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not where I was tomorrow, nor will be yesterday.
Posts: 471
|
I garrison 1 unit in each city, just in case. Forts aren't that big a deal, and they clutter up the landscape later, when the borders move. With nasty neighbors I like to set up a monolithic wall of defense--something (ideally) impenetrable (units on every tile that can prevent opponent from moving into my territory). But that's not usually necessary.
Clusters of units that are located in centralized positions (based on their MP) can move quickly to defend any point of invasion. This gets really easy after rail. Taking advantage of high ground with fortified units is a good idea, as well.
There are a lot of tactics and I just adapt them to the situation.
__________________
"We may be in a hallucination here, but that's no excuse for being delusional!." K.S. Robinson, 'The Years Of Rice And Salt.'
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2003, 22:24
|
#4
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
|
Deny the AI the highground - force them onto the flats. Then kill them. Mobile troops are best, since you can place a stack in a relatively central location and then respond quickly.
In AU208, I have a combination of catapults, knights & immortals spaced around the coast of my empire (island nation) waiting for landings. I watch incoming ships, and position my forces such that I can hit the landing force with as many cat shots as possible, and then finish with knights and/or immortals. Works well.
If you are militaristic, walls are a good investment. Spearmen, fortified, behind walls = 3.5 defense. That's nothin' to sneeze at.
One KEY thing: never, ever trust 1 unit to do a job. I don't care if it's a Mechanized Infantry division. The RNG is a cruel mistress. Border cities should have more than 1 defender, and mobile troops should be within 1-2 turns movement. If you don't have that, you're not totally safe.
However, the best advice I can give you (IMHO) is to be on the attack. The best defense... well, you know how it goes.
-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2003, 22:31
|
#5
|
Firaxis Games Programmer/Designer
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,567
|
As Arrian mentioned, numbers are your friend. I'll never forgive the RNG after that conscript barb wiped out my capital city with no HP lost...
Hilled cities are fun. Add walls to that. Attacking that city over a river will be impossible.
I've always only built forts when I run out of other improvements to work on (usually just before RRs and after I'm done laying them everywhere). If I have a lot of Workers and a lot of time they'll be on practically every tile.
As far as unit placement I always put all of my units in border cities, with mobile and attack units in my interior cities. If the AI tries to bypass I'll crush it with my interior offensive armies. Or they can smack themselves against all the defenders on the perimeter.
As Arrian also mentioned, get them on flat terrain. Uprooting fortified Spears/Pikes on mountains is such a pain you simply can't imagine. I was winning a war completely until I had to clear one of those suckers, and my entire army vanished because of one. I promptly made peace as their Immortals began to swarm, built up another army this time with Horsemen, and paid them a return visit.
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2003, 22:43
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not where I was tomorrow, nor will be yesterday.
Posts: 471
|
1 more thought on fortresses: if I'm going to build them then they are most useful in mtns. With all the defensive bonuses in such a position, then even obsolete units can hold out there until reinforced.
__________________
"We may be in a hallucination here, but that's no excuse for being delusional!." K.S. Robinson, 'The Years Of Rice And Salt.'
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2003, 20:22
|
#7
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of Pedantic Nitpicking
Posts: 231
|
The enemy knows where your defenses are. Abandon a city completely and the AI will often march right past your border defenders towards it, even if it's two to three turns away. Then hit them with your mobile units. There, that's how you set a trap.
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2003, 23:51
|
#8
|
Prince
Local Time: 21:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of Bananas
Posts: 998
|
Once I have rail roads, I see no reason to guard 90% of my cities. The only ones I guard now are those that are reachable from any rival culture square by a 3-movement offensive unit.
While a marine attack is a possibility, I take the philosophy that the defense of all my shore cities (roughly 40% of my cities in my current game) is not worth the ramifications of them actually taking a city. As I have railroads, I can easily take it back before they can establish a formidable defense (computer opponents). Now this move is entirely foolish verses a human opponent, as they may simply take over all 40% of my cities in a single turn.
I also keep troops in cities I fear of culture flipping, or ones with resistors (duh). I play communist due to my extreme size (really huge map) yet I haven't taken advantage of the military's policing aiblity, which in retrospect is quite stupid of me.
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 04:16
|
#9
|
Warlord
Local Time: 03:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 180
|
Hi,
my strategy to defend my poor empire is as follows:
The early game
In despotism only 1 unit/city (except if I don't have enough luxuries and try to build a wonder and trying to let the city grow...), but sometimes 0 units/city. In border cities maximum 2 units with better defence (also trying to make somehow (barracks) veteran units.
The fast reacting strategy
I always build an "fast reacting" army of horsmen, knights or something like that. I usually don't put them in border cities, but 1 step behind covering about 4-5 cities. If I have more than 1 border (let's say I am in the middle of pangea) I create more than 1 army like that, but maybe smaller sized, just to stop the attacking AI's army, until the next nearest horde arrives. Actually, this is also a reason, why I don't put this kind of armies into border city.
...Later, when my empire is fully railroaded (or at least the cities are connected) I join all the "fast reacting" armies into one. They can react very fast everywhare now...
The fence
In later game, I am more careful with defence. The AIs' MAs can be very powerful and fast. So I build a fence from my MIs on the border...I think, actually, the AI doesn't like these fences and the probability of starting an aggression aggainst this fence is very low. I don't really understand why... The AI has to break that fence only at 1 place (killing 1 unit) and can easily arrive to my first city (within a turn)...but the AI is not doing so.
The air
I am also placing 1 fighter per city to catch the bombers.
The ocean
Battleship & Destroyer combination on ocean, defending my coast and sinking the AI's transports. Until the destroyers are available I don't do anything in this fiels. Maybe, building some artilleries to hit the enemy ships a few times, forcing them home for maintenence...
The cold war
I also always build SAM batteries. On the end of the game sometimes I am defending myself with ICBMs...
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 04:21
|
#10
|
Warlord
Local Time: 03:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by cumi
The fence
In later game, I am more careful with defence. The AIs' MAs can be very powerful and fast. So I build a fence from my MIs on the border...I think, actually, the AI doesn't like these fences and the probability of starting an aggression aggainst this fence is very low. I don't really understand why... The AI has to break that fence only at 1 place (killing 1 unit) and can easily arrive to my first city (within a turn)...but the AI is not doing so.
|
Yes, I know now why is this good: the AI can not jump into my empire, before declaring me a war.
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 14:11
|
#11
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 74
|
Would someone please explain to me how can you surprise or trap AI units, when it knows where all of your units are located? How does this partial blindness work?
Thanks,
GarP
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 15:27
|
#12
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
By knowing it will avoid powerful stacks in good defensive position an dhead for weak or undefended cities, you can lead it to a place that is a good place to spring a trap. Some times you just get a natural trap such as a land bridge they must use. Then noting the prefered path of approach you can ambush them as well.
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 17:40
|
#13
|
King
Local Time: 20:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,209
|
As mentioned earlier, the bait for the trap is a defenseless city. Move all units out of a city and the AI will bypass well defended units. They will head straight for the defenseless city. But of course your defensive units are only a tile away and can enter the city at any time.
|
|
|
|
June 2, 2003, 23:15
|
#14
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,468
|
I have never liked to use fortresses. By the time I have set the fortresses up the AI has gone into the heart of my empire and most of the other nations have more advanced improvements then me. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 10:11
|
#15
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Haliburton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 525
|
I keep a minimum of two defenders in every city; I try for at least three in the more vulnerable (border) cities. Later I have 3 jet fighters in every border city. I seldom bother with fortresses unless I have to attack from a vulnerable tile (grassland, desert) and want to give my boys some defense before and during attack.
__________________
Jack
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 13:53
|
#16
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 74
|
vmxa1/Imtoops: Thanks for your replies. I understand the principle of baiting the AI, but dont understand why it works, since the AI can also see any units that are lying in wait close enough to harm them.
As an example, an enemy regular spearman/settler combo just walked up to my vet knight last night on Monarch level (PTW unpatched). While a knight is not a powerful stack, 2:6 is pretty bad odds to risk a settler on. Since the AI does pretty well in some strategic situations, there must be some code to assess a developing situation. I was looking for some understanding of how this works so well in some situations and not others...i.e., where "the line" is drawn.
GarP
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 14:00
|
#17
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 74
|
As long as I'm on a roll (and on my lunch hour) I have another defence question. Is there a known bug with "air superiority" for fighters? I've had games recently where it didnt work. The enemy bombers bombed cities with my fighters set on air superiority and the fighters did nothing. The AI's fighters worked just fine, unfortunately.
GarPtoo
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 16:46
|
#18
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Yes a fix was made for air superiority, I am not sure if it did the job (I do not have that many planes).
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 16:51
|
#19
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by GarP2
vmxa1/Imtoops: Thanks for your replies. I understand the principle of baiting the AI, but dont understand why it works, since the AI can also see any units that are lying in wait close enough to harm them.
As an example, an enemy regular spearman/settler combo just walked up to my vet knight last night on Monarch level (PTW unpatched). While a knight is not a powerful stack, 2:6 is pretty bad odds to risk a settler on. Since the AI does pretty well in some strategic situations, there must be some code to assess a developing situation. I was looking for some understanding of how this works so well in some situations and not others...i.e., where "the line" is drawn.
GarP
|
I think that proves the AI is not always using a well concieved plan. They send settlers out with a single unit all the time. It does not matter what the unit it, the human will take it down with number or tactics.
In my AU208 game, the babs are send a few calvs to the same area over and over. They are better units than mine, but they get whacked anyway. I hit them with cats and then an army. So why do they not send those units to a less well defended area, I don't know.
I do not have enough units to defend all over this well and can move that fast, so they could hurt me with a wiser plan.
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 17:08
|
#20
|
Prince
Local Time: 19:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Rob_S
1 more thought on fortresses: if I'm going to build them then they are most useful in mtns. With all the defensive bonuses in such a position, then even obsolete units can hold out there until reinforced.
|
I've used forts seriously just once, on a mountainous choke point which separated me from the rest of my continent and few annoyed civs. I placed several cannons and defenders in them and they proved quite useful. The problem was when I expanded by war past the choke point, and didn't need the forts (I was afraid the AI would use them against me if I left them there), I couldn't pillage my own forts before pillaging the roads that ran through them. Irritating.
__________________
"Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription is ... more cow bell!"
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 17:13
|
#21
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 74
|
Oops! I meant 2:4 odds in that last post. Still the same idea.
Sometimes the AI amazes me with how well it maneuvers, especially when attacking my cities. It explained a lot when I finally found out that it knew where all my units were. It seems to be pretty good at the old chess maneuver of double attack - making a move that threatens attack at 2 different points at the same time - used to force defenders to go the wrong direction or spread too thin. But maybe I'm just reading too much into it.
Thanks for info on the air superiority fix. I like aircraft, so I use them a lot, and am glad to hear it got fixed. My game computer is not the same as my web computer, so I have to firewall/virus protect it before I go online to get the patch, or set up a local network, but its more fun to use my time to play the game. This info will be an incentive.
Thanks, GarP
|
|
|
|
June 3, 2003, 18:23
|
#22
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 551
|
Does the unpatched regular Civ3 have an air superiority bug? That's what I have and when I set fighters to air superiority they do nothing. People have told me to download the 1.29 patch. Where can I find this patch and does it fix the air superiority bug?
Off topic: Just out of curiousity, is the capital for the Ottomans Ankara? (I don't have PTW)
__________________
"The first man who, having fenced off a plot of land, thought of saying, 'This is mine' and found people simple enough to believe him was the real founder of civil society. How many crimes, wars, murders, how many miseries and horrors might the human race had been spared by the one who, upon pulling up the stakes or filling in the ditch, had shouted to his fellow men: 'Beware of listening to this imposter; you are lost if you forget the fruits of the earth belong to all and that the earth belongs to no one." - Jean-Jacques Rousseau
|
|
|
|
June 4, 2003, 08:51
|
#23
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 02:48
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 74
|
Related question: If you load PTW does that also upgrade Civ 3 to the latest patch or do you have to do that separately?
Thanks, GarP
|
|
|
|
June 4, 2003, 09:18
|
#24
|
Prince
Local Time: 21:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of Bananas
Posts: 998
|
Pretty sure Civ3 and PTW are completely different.
|
|
|
|
June 4, 2003, 11:25
|
#25
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kneel before Grog!
Posts: 17,978
|
GarP2,
There have been two patches post-PTW. So you install PTW and then patch the game. Many of us continue to use the 1.14 patch (first one) because the newest (1.21) hasn't been released in Europe and many of us are involved in PBEM/Democracy/Succession games that are using 1.14. Sir Ralph has explained how to do a dual installation such that you can pretty easily switch between 1.14 and 1.21 (I forget exactly where that explanation is here at 'poly, but it's topped over at central.masterzen.net).
-Arrian
__________________
grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
|
|
|
|
June 4, 2003, 14:39
|
#26
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:48
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oviedo, Fl
Posts: 14,103
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by GarP2
Related question: If you load PTW does that also upgrade Civ 3 to the latest patch or do you have to do that separately?
Thanks, GarP
|
Yes and no. PTW install will upgrade CivIII to 1.29f if it was not already. The patches after that are for PTW only and no more patches will be done for CivIII.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:48.
|
|