Thread Tools
Old July 5, 2003, 12:29   #1
DinoDoc
Civilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
DinoDoc's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Underwater no one can hear sharks scream
Posts: 11,096
Same-Sex Marriage: Canada, Europe and the United States
Quote:
In 1999 the Supreme Court of Canada held that same-sex couples must be granted essentially the same rights as married couples. On June 10 of this year the Court of Appeal of Ontario held that gays have a right to get married. The constitutional basis for the decision lay in the principles of human dignity and anti-discrimination. The federal government decided not to appeal this and similar cases, but instead to institute legislation toward the same effect. Questions arise about the impact these developments might have on the gay community in the United States.

Canada is not the first country to recognize same-sex marriages. In 2001 the Netherlands opened civil marriage to gay couples and allowed them to adopt children as well. Belgium followed suit on June 1st of this year, although it did not go as far as the Netherlands: gay couples have no adoption rights in Belgium. Most other European countries only allow for some kind of registered partnership with some degree of protection, following the lead of Denmark where such partnerships were introduced in 1989. By now most legal systems in Europe provide some kind of status, even in Catholic countries like Spain. Some states of the United States have followed. In 1995 the Hawaiian legislature, following a court decision, gave couples a significant number of the same rights that married couples enjoy. In 1998 the Alaskan Supreme Court held similarly. California, the District of Columbia and, most famously, Vermont, provide registries for same-sex partnerships and grant them certain rights.

The Canadian decision stands out for two reasons: First, Canada is a direct neighbor to the United States, easily accessible for Americans, and is usually considered to be on the same wavelength. Second, marriage for gay couples goes far beyond mere "registered partnerships" as available in the named states of the U.S. The possible impact on the United States is twofold: First, gay American couples may want to get married in Canada. Second, the decision may give impulse to similar developments in the United States. However, both effects are far less than clear.

First comes the question whether American couples can go to Canada to get married. Canada does not have a residency requirement for marriage. Indeed, Ontario has already started to give out marriage licenses to Americans. Yet this may not remain the full answer. For recognition purposes, Canadian law so far has looked to the partners' domicile to determine their capacity to get married. If sexual orientation is considered an issue for capacity (as the Court of Appeal of Ontario explicitly says in its decision), there is a real possibility that Canadian officials will eventually refuse to marry Americans who come into the country only to get married. Most legislative models in the world restrict access in order to avoid marriage tourism (and the possible implications for international relations). The Dutch legislation, for example, opens marriage to foreign couples only if one partner is Dutch or at least a resident in the Netherlands. Belgium will only marry foreigners that come from jurisdictions that allow for same-sex partnerships. The Court of Appeal of Ontario did not need to address the question, because its case involved Canadian couples. The legislature probably will address the question, and it may not be receptive to the interests of American same-sex couples.

Even if American same-sex couples can get married in Canada, their marriage may not be recognized back home in the United States. Such recognition is, at present, highly unlikely in most states. Even a partnership entered into in Vermont will not be recognized in most other states of the Union: thirty states have passed statutes prohibiting such recognition. Moreover, Congress passed, in 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), [1] which explicitly frees states from the duty to recognize same sex partnerships entered into in other states. The constitutionality of these state statutes has been questioned, although courts so far have applied them to same-sex partners seeking a divorce. Yet even if the Full Faith and Credit clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to recognize same sex-partnerships, this applies only between states of the United States. States have much more freedom in deciding whether to recognize the laws, judgments and administrative decisions of other nations, and have always used this freedom in areas with strong political or moral elements. Thus, no state is required to recognize a same-sex marriage entered into in Canada, and even if one state recognizes it, other states might not be obliged to recognize this first state's decision. While same-sex marriages between two Canadians might be recognized by some states, recognition of marriages between same-sex partners domiciled in the United States is highly unlikely. This is because the law applicable to capacity to marry is usually that of the partners' domicile, which, for American domiciliaries, does not allow them to get married. Same-sex American couples validly married in Ontario will thus still be considered unmarried in most of the United States. Even Vermont is far from certain to recognize such marriages, given how carefully the legislature avoided the term “marriage” for same-sex couples in the Vermont legislation.

Notwithstanding these facts, gay couples who get married in Canada and then seek recognition in the United States, or who seek the right to get married in the U.S., will have to convince either the courts or the legislators if they want to achieve married status in the U.S. A case essentially similar to the one in Ontario, asking for same sex partners’ right to get married, is pending before the courts of Massachusetts. But will the court follow the Canadian example? The new U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, [2] striking down the Texas ban on gay sex as unconstitutional, may be a first step toward gay rights. But the way from decriminalization of gay relations to their formal recognition as institutionalized marriage is long. And comparative constitutional law has so far had relatively little impact on Constitutional decisions in the U.S, despite the Supreme Court majority’s reference in the Lawrence case to some decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Justice Scalia, dissenting in the Lawrence case, certainly voiced a widely held opinion when he said that "where there is not first a settled consensus among our own people, the views of other nations, however enlightened the Justices of this Court may think them to be, cannot be imposed upon Americans through the Constitution." It seems unlikely that the Canadian example will have any direct impact in the United States.

[1] 1 U.S. Code § 7.

[2] Full text available on the Supreme Court‘s web site, at <http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinio...ipopinion.html> .
http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh111.htm

I thought that a few people might find this interesting given the recent news.
__________________
Rosbifs are destructive scum- Spiffor
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
If government is big enough to give you everything you want, it is also big enough to take everything you have. - Gerald Ford
Blackwidow24 and FemmeAdonis fan club
DinoDoc is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 13:17   #2
Shi Huangdi
Emperor
 
Shi Huangdi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,213
Interesting. Anybody have any idea what the poll numbers are in this country regarding support for gay marriage?
__________________
"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Shi Huangdi is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 13:23   #3
MrFun
Emperor
 
MrFun's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,595
Thanks for an interesting article, DinoDoc.
__________________
STFU and then GTFO!
MrFun is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:30   #4
Zkribbler
Deity
 
Zkribbler's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Bohol
Posts: 13,381
Quote:
Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
Interesting. Anybody have any idea what the poll numbers are in this country regarding support for gay marriage?
I don't have any actual numbers, but it's a distinct minority in every state. Vermont didn't even try for same-sex marriages but only same-sex "unions."

However, in my lifetime, I've seen Brown v. Board of Education desegregate schools, the Civil Right Act outlaw discrimination in the workplace, gays come out of the closet and women being given equal rights.

It's only a matter of time before gays are given the full rights of citizenship, including marriage. Maybe not with the name "marriage," but certainly all of the rights if being married.
Zkribbler is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:33   #5
mrboo123
Rise of Nations MultiplayerC4DG VoxCiv4 SP Democracy GameNationStates
King
 
mrboo123's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,716
Trust me, I ain't proud of having it, I can only hope they don't let them have kids!
__________________
Former President, Vice-president and Foreign Minister of the Apolyton Civ2-Democracy Games as 123john321
mrboo123 is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:38   #6
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by 123john321
Trust me, I ain't proud of having it, I can only hope they don't let them have kids!
Certainly they could do a better job at teaching love and tolerance than your parents.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:41   #7
Evil Knevil
Prince
 
Evil Knevil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St Andrews, Scotland.
Posts: 413
Yeah, who are "they" ?
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Evil Knevil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:42   #8
Wezil
Deity
 
Wezil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 13,074
I wouldn't be too sure about the tolerance issue Asher - not a very tolerant community themselves actually....

Important to note the decision in Canada was a LEGAL decision not a political one (ie it doesn't matter what the poll numbers say...).
__________________
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Wezil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:48   #9
Evil Knevil
Prince
 
Evil Knevil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St Andrews, Scotland.
Posts: 413
It certainly looks like the USA has itself covered as far as legally recognising same-sex marriages. Shame, although if a couple do try it then there will still be a ruckus (with Phelps and co sadly).
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Evil Knevil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 15:49   #10
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by Wezil
I wouldn't be too sure about the tolerance issue Asher - not a very tolerant community themselves actually....
Yeah, I totally see the gay community protesting against straights having equal rights.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:03   #11
Shi Huangdi
Emperor
 
Shi Huangdi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,213
If the gay community tries to overplay their hand here, they could do great damage against their movement if they try to force the issue of gay marriage now at a time when the current Supreme Court and the current legislatures are not likely to be helpful. A strong legal or political decision against them could do grave damage to their movement.
__________________
"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Shi Huangdi is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:06   #12
Wezil
Deity
 
Wezil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 13,074
What is the reaction in the gay community when THEIR point of view is not accepted Asher?

You know the answer and I can provide a link that illustrates the point Asher (I think you're being obtuse),
__________________
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Wezil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:06   #13
Evil Knevil
Prince
 
Evil Knevil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St Andrews, Scotland.
Posts: 413
I doubt it will do great damage, but you're right.

The gay rights movement musnt overplay its hand or appear shrill.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Evil Knevil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:09   #14
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by Wezil
What is the reaction in the gay community when THEIR point of view is not accepted Asher?

You know the answer and I can provide a link that illustrates the point Asher (I think you're being obtuse),
You mean their point of view is not accepted, as in that they should be treated as second-class citizens?

I think the reaction of the gay community would be one of feeling terribly insulted, frustration, and anger over being repressed by people whose only goal is to force their religious beliefs on society as a whole.

Most gay people are tolerant, others are vengeful and resent the way they're treated in society. But do you know whose fault that is?
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:10   #15
Wezil
Deity
 
Wezil's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 13,074
What is the reaction in the gay community when THEIR point of view is not accepted Asher? This is my point.

to illustrate:

http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/coren.html

edit: sorry for the dp - 1st post was slow in showing up....
__________________
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Wezil is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:14   #16
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
That very column you link to says itself that it's not representive of the gay community. I dunno, try reading it next time?

And that guy falls under the
Quote:
vengeful and resent the way they're treated in society
category.

And despite what you might think, anyone who says gays should not be allowed to marry is being insulting, is acting somehow superior and giving gays less rights than straight couples get.

Some of those people may not be bright enough to realize that, but that's their problem.
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:19   #17
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
That very column you link to says itself that it's not representive of the gay community. I dunno, try reading it next time?

And that guy falls under the
Quote:
vengeful and resent the way they're treated in society
category.

And despite what you might think, anyone who says gays should not be allowed to marry is being insulting, is acting somehow superior and giving gays less rights than straight couples get.

Some of those people may not be bright enough to realize that, but that's their problem.
u demand the tax benefits that badly?
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:19   #18
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
After reading his column it's pretty obvious to me that he really doesn't like gays.

1. The obvious "I have gay friends and coworkers who do not hate me!"
2. Pointing out in parantheses that "gay activists" threw condoms around and torched a church in Montreal (this relates to his column, how?).
3. Tried to excuse his column before he even wrote it
4. Played the family card, "will my children be safe with all these homos around who hate me???"

I don't expect any more from Sun columnists. The Sun is a tabloid.
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:20   #19
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by yavoon
u demand the tax benefits that badly?
I demand to be given equal rights and not feel like a second-class citizen.

It's not just about tax benefits, it's about equality and principle.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:22   #20
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher

I demand to be given equal rights and not feel like a second-class citizen.

It's not just about tax benefits, it's about equality and principle.
so u want a piece of government paper saying ur married. but are willing to forgo the tax and healthcare benefits?

though the christians might want you to call it a civil union.
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:24   #21
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by yavoon
so u want a piece of government paper saying ur married. but are willing to forgo the tax and healthcare benefits?

How would forgoing tax and healthcare benefits be giving me equal rights?

Quote:
though the christians might want you to call it a civil union.
Hey, that's all good too, as long as the government only gives you civil unions to all couples, and marriages can still be done at churches.

In fact, that's how I think it should be done. There is no reason whatsoever for the government to be involved with a religious concept like marriage, especially if they're going to base legal rights on it and deny people marriage for their own religious reasons.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:25   #22
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher


How would forgoing tax and healthcare benefits be giving me equal rights?


Hey, that's all good too, as long as the government only gives you civil unions to all couples, and marriages can still be done at churches.

In fact, that's how I think it should be done. There is no reason whatsoever for the government to be involved with a religious concept like marriage, especially if they're going to base legal rights on it and deny people marriage for their own religious reasons.
I must have missed the part where a tax incentive is a right? maybe u'd like to explain to me where that is located.
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:28   #23
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by yavoon
I must have missed the part where a tax incentive is a right? maybe u'd like to explain to me where that is located.
*sigh*
A tax incentive isn't a right.

Being treated equally without discrimination by the government is.

And since the government deals with tax incentives, all couples should be allowed to be eligble for those tax incentives.

Freedom from oppression of religion of the state (separation of church and state) is also a right that is ignored by having the state use religious criteria to determine legal issues.

You're wasting your breath arguing about this, the courts has ruled it is unconstitutional to deny gays marriage, so whether you want to convince yourself otherwise is entirely your perogative, but you just look a tad bit dense.

Last edited by Asher; July 5, 2003 at 16:36.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:38   #24
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
I never said deny them marriage. I simply asked u to point where the gov't handing out tax incentives is a right? obviously you know it isnt. I know it isnt.

taxes are not usually allocated fairly anyway. its usually some government imposition in an attempt to gain a benefit. in marriages case you are trying to create a favorable system to promote couples staying together so the children are raised w/ both parents.

now surely if the gov't wants it could give tax incentives to gay ppl. but I see no compelling argument as to why it HAS TO.
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:39   #25
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
I don't see why the government has to give straight people tax incentives either. After all, it isn't a right!



Stunning argument, that.
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:39   #26
Nubclear
NationStatesCall to Power II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamRise of Nations MultiplayerACDG The Human HiveNever Ending StoriesACDG The Free DronesACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessGalCiv Apolyton EmpireACDG3 SpartansC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansCiv4 SP Democracy GameDiplomacyAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization IV PBEMAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Peace
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
 
Nubclear's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally posted by yavoon


I must have missed the part where a tax incentive is a right? maybe u'd like to explain to me where that is located.
lololol Asher r0x0rs my b0x0rs lolol OMG OMG !!!!!!11111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111
Nubclear is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:41   #27
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally posted by Asher
I don't see why the government has to give straight people tax incentives either. After all, it isn't a right!



Stunning argument, that.
exactly the point. they don't. taxes are like that. its means to ends sort of thing.

so u standing up and yelling and pissing about how its ur damn right. when its not. isnt polite.
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:43   #28
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
Quote:
Originally posted by yavoon
exactly the point. they don't. taxes are like that. its means to ends sort of thing.

so u standing up and yelling and pissing about how its ur damn right. when its not. isnt polite.
Look at the title of this thread.

On my screen it says "Same-Sex Marriage: Canada, Europe and the United States", what does it say on yours? Does it say "Tax Incentives: Canada, Europe and the United States"?

You're the one that brought up tax incentives, then you tell me I'm not being polite because I'm saying it's my right to have tax incentives when I've clearly said:
Quote:
*sigh*
A tax incentive isn't a right.
You have issues, man.
Asher is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 16:47   #29
yavoon
Warlord
 
Local Time: 05:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 155
"And since the government deals with tax incentives, all couples should be allowed to be eligble for those tax incentives"

I clearly asked about the taxes. I said "civil union but no tax or healthcare benefits" and u sed the quote at the top. I didn't just randomnly spring this on u so dont pull that.
yavoon is offline  
Old July 5, 2003, 17:19   #30
Asher
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
President of the OT
 
Asher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:07
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 40,843
__________________
"I'll never doubt you again when it comes to hockey, [Prince] Asher." - Guynemer
Asher is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team