July 23, 2003, 11:04
|
#1
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brno, Czech Republic
Posts: 172
|
Building infrastructure after Update 2.0
Hello all!
Now that I'm using Update 2.0 and paying correct infrastructure costs, I'm finding it hard to "do everything at once" like I'm used to when I don't have exceptionally favorable luck in gaining early-midgame income and artifacts. That is, first of all, getting RC's in place quick enough to get the WP and VW built quick enough to build population to at least drone size 4-5. Delaying the WP is meaning the arrival of an abundance of crawlable forests later, further delaying the VW. Delaying the VW is delaying growth, because I have always avoided building Hologram Theaters in favor of building the VW, but the delay in RC's is now causing a delay in building up enough crawlers for an early one-turn build. I have thus ended up with two games where I could even do a treefarm boom in theory, but haven't due to not having the VW (let alone the energy to rush-build NN's). I have also always avoided building energy banks in SMACX, preferring to build the PEG.
Maybe I am just being too picky about how I am building SP's...
The test games I've played have been with Miriam and with (don't laugh, I hardly ever play these guys but since I hardly play them, I took them for a spin now) the Usurpers and Caretakers. I find the latter two almost more energy-starved than humans, since they can't benefit from trade or the governorship, and can have trouble hitting up humans for loans or selling techs.
In my first, Miriam game, I had the monsoon jungle to myself, but had major trouble taking advantage of it due to being on an extremely jaggy large island (the largest mass in an archipelago that, to make matters worse, contained a good part of the Jungle). The chart showed me running away with the game, I was crawling heavily, but the jagginess made it hard to concentrate my crawlers in one turn. In the phase where I quit, the power chart showed me as beginning to run away with the game, but in reality I felt weak. Everyone except my pactmate Aki and per-HAPS my enemy Santiago was too far away to vassalize easily without leaving FM. Despite my good tech rate, I was rapidly slipping to the Gaians due to having sold her tech early in the game to keep buying RC's fast enough to expand under FM without going doctor-crazy. We're currently at peace, and I dread the consequences of going to war just to probe her (and the huge travel time through the archipelago out to the southern powers makes even probing the unpleasantly tech-advanced Hive, who I'll doubtlessly be forced to fight sooner, a tough call). When I return to that game, I probably face a late-game showndown against a high-tech Deirdre with (already) the Xenoempathy dome and the WP, which she snagged :-(.
In my Usurpers game, I actually wasn't doing too bad overall -- had oodles of bases and crawlers, but kept waiting for that one-turn VW build, so was paying toward the end up to 40% for psych so I could keep at least some bases droneless at size 3 by crawing forests for 2 energy a pop. Probably not a good idea, but I'd never done it before so I thought I'd test it out. Overall, I really was, despite my paranoia, running away with the game, having vassalized, though unfortunately also eradicated, the Gaians and Morganites early on). But I just hated having such small bases. I also couldn't decide how to handle an invasion of the large island right next to my huge continent where Santiago had landed after H'minee eradicated her (eradication MANIA that game!)... while it certainly promised great benefits, I hated the thought of doing it under FM without the acceleration provided by missile tech; meanwhile, without my old standby Demo/Planned and not yet having Green to use as part of a viable non-FM, non-Demo alternative, I didn't just want to throw impact units at the "problem". I also was dreading the decision between Fundy and Police (not that I had Police yet) and above all I was constantly researching techs I wanted NOW, like the restriction lifters, the missile branch, and Fundy and Police themselves.
I think my insanely fast expansion in this game was part of my cashflow problems -- when you're building a rec commons or two every turn to get newfounded bases off to the right start, it really eats up the energy.
Curious as to how the Caretakers would fare, I played them most recently... got handed a large but insanely jaggy continent with a snippet of jungle, a ridiculously close Aki, whom I quickly bullied for a tech and a base and then vassalized but also eradicated, the Pirates right next to the Monsoon Jungle and me (as yusual... sigh) and the Usurpers with a nice chunk of prime real estate on the other side of a strait. Once again the land-poor home area and overall jaggedness of the starting portion is slowing my artifact finds and crawler builds and thus my WP build; meanwhile I am running simple/planned/wealth and am so far able to reach size three. A lot may change soon - a bay to the SW of the Usurper subcontinent contains the Sargasso sea, and I have a
UNITY SCOUT CHOPPER OH YEAH
to defend the transport foil that is down there busily mining for artifacts, and to the W of that there are for some reason 4-5 huge fungal towers just waiting to make me money (which are a major reason why I'm not running FM yet).
The Usurpers are so far bottled in, AFAICT, by their own hesitation to approach my probe team and 3r garrison at a key bottleneck, which is dumb but I'm not complaining, and I am starting to mine them for techs, while playing the dangerous game of colonizing their NE shore due to absence of other easily-reachable base sites for my core bases. I'm trying to decide whether to tackle the Pirates or the Usurpers first -- the former I could probably do without ever generating pacifism drones if I use missile foils; the latter would let me avoid fighting on two fronts and put an end to a war that can only end one way, but would be hard to fight under FM.
But above all... slower to WP (don't have it yet IIRC, it was a 5 a.m. bedtime game...), slower to VW, slower to decent base sizes and of course tech than I'd like.
Thoughts? I can attach any or all save files on request.
USC
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 14:00
|
#2
|
Moderator
Local Time: 08:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Datalinks
Posts: 1,340
|
I'd be interested in looking at your Caretaker game. Can you post it?
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 14:47
|
#3
|
Warlord
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
|
Save games! Save games! It's much better than text.
I know what you mean about the upkeep biting. I never used to build the VW, even before I found out out about the bug. The 3 energy per turn never seemed much of a problem, somehow. It was a real shock when my first facility got sold off.
Anyway... I've recently started playing both aliens in a PBEM, and I've been finding FM pretty useless. Without wealth, it hardly does anything. By the time you get IA, you're already close to hitting the baselimit.
The best solution is definitely to build the HGP. It should be basically the first thing you do with your crawlers, IMO. Upgrade 4 to trance and you're there.
The only other decent option is to drop into planned and use police. That will, at least, keep you expanding.
Rec commons slow you down too much, even without the upkeep. Unless you absolutely have no other choice, I wouldn't build them until you're ready to pop-boom.
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 16:00
|
#4
|
King
Local Time: 01:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Posts: 2,108
|
If you don't want facilities and dont get the SP's then use specialists, just crawl some nuts to feed the doctors (ack!), if that's what it takes.
In general, it's mostly a matter of keeping the right balance between Nuts, Energy and Mins; once you get crawlers, you can pretty much have whichever you want, so I suppose that you are really about optimizing something or other rather than actually having real trouble.
I didn't see any references to the PTS in there - it can be kind of useful in the sort of game it sounds like you're playing.
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 16:22
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
HGP isn't a bad choice for fixing early drone problems, and if you're reliant on a Golden Age to Pop Boom, you'll need it later anyway. The problem is that to get it before you hit your first bureaucracy, you'll NEED an alien artifact, preferrably 2. If you're Lal or Domai, I wouldn't bother, get WP instead.
If you haven't hit the baselimit by the time you've got IA, however, you're doing something greviously wrong. You need to have a lot of bases to get the most out of Free Market.
I disagree about commons slowing you down, the trick is to only build them where you need them. If you've done your job right running FM, you should have Recycling Tanks in each base, and a good stockpile of ECs (a bit over 100 should do) banked up when you're ready to plant your base that will trigger the drone warning. Immediately after you plant your base, check your psych report on F4, and find out where your B-drones have cropped up. Change production and rush-build rec-commons in those bases only. If you can't afford to rush right away, get by with a doctor until you can.
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 21:16
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Eurytion Mining Camp: 100°C dayside, 100°F nightside.
Posts: 875
|
Quote:
|
UnityScoutChopper said:
Hello all!
Now that I'm using Update 2.0 and paying correct infrastructure costs...
|
Is that the XP Compatibility Patch? If so, relevant to that, I have a small request for something that might help a lot of people and save repeated answers. Would someone who knows the exact answer post in the FAQ thread ( The SMAC/X FAQ: COMMON QUESTIONS and their ANSWERS) the answers to some questions:[list=1][*]Which patch is "Update 2.0"?[*]Which game is it for: Alpha Centauri or Alien Crossfire?[*]What exactly is corrected, both (a) in general and (b) specific to infrastructure costs?[*]Does the correction apply to any specific difficulty level or levels?[/list=1]An itemized reply is not necessary, as long as all points are covered.
I put this request here because of Rules 1 and 3 of the FAQ thread:
Quote:
|
1) You must post a common question.
3) You must also post the answer to it... don't post your question here.
|
__________________
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't your thing.
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2003, 22:36
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
Your request has been granted. I've re-worded some of the questions to better fit the answers I was prepared to give, but the essence of the questions above has been addressed:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...22#post2202039
Look it over and lemme know if that's what you need.
|
|
|
|
July 24, 2003, 11:44
|
#8
|
Warlord
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by CEO Aaron
If you haven't hit the baselimit by the time you've got IA, however, you're doing something greviously wrong.
|
Hmm, really? Depends on the faction, sure - with Miriam you will, with Zak probably not - but when would you expect to hit IA/the baselimit? I'd normally get IA first with Deirdre, mostly with Morgan, and always with Zak.
The trouble with Rec commons, I find, is that as you make the transition from 8 to 16 bases you will go from no psych problems, to having only 1-2 bases which don't need a commons. Since this tends to happen over the course of about 10 turns, the cash is hard to come by. Perhaps it's possible with Morgan... but then, if you don't get the HGP with Morgan, then times are going to be tough.
|
|
|
|
July 24, 2003, 18:37
|
#9
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
I guess it also depends on what mapsize you're accustomed to play on. I play Large maps, so a 0 efficiency faction will get 6 bases before b-drones. I'm very unlikely to have IA by that time.
|
|
|
|
July 24, 2003, 19:34
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 404
|
It's about the same for me as with Curiosity, I get IA about the same speed. Do you ignore formers in the beginning?
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2003, 14:10
|
#11
|
Princess
Local Time: 00:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by CEO Aaron
Your request has been granted. I've re-worded some of the questions to better fit the answers I was prepared to give, but the essence of the questions above has been addressed:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...22#post2202039
Look it over and lemme know if that's what you need.
|
According to this post, there are actaully changes from v4.0 to v5.0, or the XP patch. Would the FAQ entry need to be updated?
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2003, 14:47
|
#12
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
Okay, I've updated my FAQ post to reflect that information.
|
|
|
|
July 25, 2003, 14:56
|
#13
|
Moderator
Local Time: 08:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Datalinks
Posts: 1,340
|
CEO Aaron: I sent you a PM some time ago(!) and I just read your update. I'm not sure your information is correct, though. I also suggest that this particular discussion moves to the post HongHu refers to.
UnityScoutChopper: Still no attached save file?!?
|
|
|
|
July 28, 2003, 07:41
|
#14
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brno, Czech Republic
Posts: 172
|
Back from vacation, will post game tonight...
Curiosity wrote:
Quote:
|
The best solution is definitely to build the HGP.
|
I traditionally worshipped the HGP, but I found it's rather in disfavor in relation to the WP here, and have been playing a lot with the latter as a goal instead, in order to form my opinion. Before SMACX 2.0, the arguments in favor of doing both the early WP AND early (pre-2170 for me, maybe "real men's" early FM is earlier) Free Market together (another favorite of forum public opinion) held OK. Now there seems to be even less reason for the double trouble -- choosing just one makes the whole affair more doable, assuming that you are like me and don't really see an advantage in FM if it turns your workers to doctors. So yes -- one solution seems to be to ignore an early WP in favor of an HGP-fueled FM; the other seems to be to ignore FM so that your first SP can be the WP.
Quote:
|
It should be basically the first thing you do with your {trance-upgraded} crawlers, IMO.
|
There are many games where builder factions get lucky and I can build the HGP/WP before getting crawlers, or just not build them.) And if I'm building my first SP using crawlers, I may well not yet have SOTHB, due to beelining to IA. Also, I don't like the micromanagement involved in crawler-upgrade-based builds -- although if it tips things to the point where I can build my desired SP's more often, I guess it's worth it. Good point!
Quote:
|
Anyway... I've recently started playing both aliens in a PBEM, and I've been finding FM pretty useless.
|
Having long been a fan of Planned, then Wealth, then Demo, then FM during the opening, I opened a discussion of "early FM" (which I'd define as pre-2170 or in the extreme case pre-2160) recently; although it is much broader than just the Aliens, you might find it interesting. I think the most recent post in the thread is about 3-5 weeks old.
My take: Miriam can handle FM well by going Demo early and thus hitting the base limit later, Domai and Lal can handle it well due to their free droneless population; a Zak lucky enough to get the VW early will mop up Planet with early FM; other factions need the HGP or plenty of RC's to make it work. Some shouldn't bother; I consider Morgan among these due to his ability to reach +2 Econ with Wealth and without the minus frickin' 5 police rating, but there are those who vehemently promote an FM Morgan. As for the Aliens... the Caretakers may well indeed not be suited for early FM since it would lose them the ability to move CP's through fungus easily, capture worms, etc. (loss of the +1 Planet rating), but the jury is still out for me on the Usurpers.
Quote:
|
The only other decent option is to drop into planned and use police.
|
Science-poor options are in disfavor on these forums in general; as for me, I don't mind demo/planned, which trades some science for great, sufficiently-police-aided expansion, but I've really been trying to see things the forum's way in recent games. In any case, Police/Planned requires veering off the IA beeline, although one MIGHT try a
Planned-->
Police-->going former crazy and enjoying droneless growth-->
building energy in the home base and perhaps also the inner circle-->
researching II-->
Police Infrantry-->
Demo
tactic... I've not seen much written about that, and it's not applicable for the Usurpers anyway, but it might be worth a test game.
Quote:
|
Rec commons slow you down too much, even without the upkeep. Unless you absolutely have no other choice, I wouldn't build them until you're ready to pop-boom.
|
I understand the point, and the mentioned games argue in that direction. Don't forget, however, that first-citizen doctors are far worse than RC's under FM until crawled CF's become possible , and under Planned, there also soon comes a point where RC's are not all that bad of a deal -- when REXing you soon reach the point where you need to quell two drones to pop a pod anyway. (Note: I realize that a second-citizen doctor is no great loss, but I HATE drone riots and I HATE WATCHING for growth-induced drone riots.) And if you're running Demo/Planned and/or building am early former in most new bases, the support gain of not building a garrison is a nice reward for having built the RC.
johndmuller:
Quote:
|
If you don't want facilities and dont get the SP's then use specialists, just crawl some nuts to feed the doctors (ack!), if that's what it takes.
|
Good call for the games when IA arrives early, which is not all, but is some. Thanks.
Quote:
|
I didn't see any references to the PTS in there - it can be kind of useful in the sort of game it sounds like you're playing.
|
The PTS is a second-pickings SP for me -- I take it if I can't take the VW, except in the rare game where I see that I need it for the governorship. The VW is a ticket to pain-free vertical growth and pain-free FM; the PTS is very nice, but requires expansion both former-supported and fast to milk it to the fullest.
CEO Aaron:
Quote:
|
HGP isn't a bad choice for fixing early drone problems, and if you're reliant on a Golden Age to Pop Boom, you'll need it later anyway. The problem is that to get it before you hit your first bureaucracy, you'll NEED an alien artifact, preferrably 2. If you're Lal or Domai, I wouldn't bother, get WP instead.
|
Actually, it's not hitting the baselimit that is the problem -- it is exceeding it by about three or four bases (as the first extra drones tend to be easy to handle). And getting 2 AA's is not such a problem. It's more the unpleasant decision of giving up the WP, now that I understand its utility, that's tough. And those pesky lucky builders who can rob you even of both if you wait for crawlers... which perhaps I shouldn't be, as often. One small note on Lal/Domai: if you expand so fast that you soon hit the SECOND bureacracy limit as I often do, then the HGP can often still be relevant.
Quote:
|
If you've done your job right running FM, you should have Recycling Tanks in each base, and a good stockpile of ECs (a bit over 100 should do) banked up when you're ready to plant your base that will trigger the drone warning.
|
WAY too much micromanagement and artificial delay of horizontal expansion for me--this is part of what I don't like about FM. Also, money spent is money earned -- I always have something worth spending EC's on, that will start earning interest on them immediately... I'm not going to go around "saving up" EC's; I'd rather save up minerals towards RC's in a large number of bases and spend them the moment a new base puts them in the red, which is in fact what I try to do.
Quote:
|
Change production and rush-build rec-commons in those bases only. If you can't afford to rush right away, get by with a doctor until you can.
|
This, though, more or less matches what I do. One question: how many lost minerals are you willing to give up when such a base is over its first 10?
Quote:
|
The trouble with Rec commons, I find, is that as you make the transition from 8 to 16 bases you will go from no psych problems, to having only 1-2 bases which don't need a commons. Since this tends to happen over the course of about 10 turns, the cash is hard to come by.
|
THAT is a great expression of the problem I'm running into. (I've gone down to Large maps, so the numbers are even 6/12 instead of 8/16!)
Sounds like in short some solutions are:
- choose only one of early FM or WP-instead-of-HGP, but not both, unless you see you're doing very well in the AA and/or crawling department or have tons of cash or are playing Lal/Domai/lucky-Zak/low-basecount demo-boosted Miriam
- use upgraded crawlers more
- micromanage RC's even more
- use CF crawling to enable doctors as an RC alternative ASAP if you've got it
- consider PTS/former-intensive fringes for nuts/single-doctoring as a solution (is that what you meant?)
- consider the above-sketched low-tech police/planned strategy (especially when vassalization is an option)
All for now
USC
|
|
|
|
July 28, 2003, 08:12
|
#15
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Winfield, IL, USA
Posts: 2,533
|
One comment on Morgan - he is wonderful for early FM/wealth since his small bases generate oodles of energy by comparison to pop. This makes up for small size, and lets him get critical tech and development until his can GA boom. Then I'm happy with dem/green/wealth or dem/green/knowl/GA. By this point size is not an issue since you've phased GA boomed to a nice and competative size.
|
|
|
|
July 28, 2003, 08:18
|
#16
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 404
|
Why have early FM at all? Before your expansion phase is done the 2 growth/1 industry is almost as good as the 2 economy and if you need to sacrifice something for it, it's not worth it. I use FM for a VW Zak, for Lal (not Domai, he just builds CPs too fast) and ignore it in general for everyone else.
Miriam is the last person I'd use FM with, she needs to get a powerbase fast so that she can start kicking butt.
Edit: Ok Yang is the last person I'd use FM with, but still.
|
|
|
|
July 28, 2003, 10:18
|
#17
|
Emperor
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,521
|
With proper maintenance costing the build of Planetary Energy Guild (PEG) becomes a tremendous boon. If midgame energy woes are giving you fits look by all means to build this gem of a SP as soon as you can divert your tech beelines.
__________________
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
|
|
|
|
July 28, 2003, 13:48
|
#18
|
Warlord
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
|
USC,
Firstly, I admit that when I say early-FM I'm thinking 2120 or before. The earlier you start using FM, the easier it is to keep on using it, since you get crawlers et al. that much faster, and the drone problems are not significant for a while yet.
There's no particular trick to this, just research cent. eco, ind base and ind. eco and do it, creating doctors as needed. I think you'll be surprised.
Once you get crawlers early enough, building both WP and HGP in one turn in the 2150's will look fairly reasonable. Not with Miriam, obviously but with the good-to-middling tech factions. This is really the key; once you can research fast early on, you can solve your problems almost before they start.
The WP is very good, but IMO, mainly for a situation where you can get it built significantly before you get environmental economics. (I've had some interesting games skipping the whole Industrial line (heresy! ) and building the WP very early, then booming with condensor farms/forests. Works OK-ish on very small islands, but you kind of need an AA.)
Generally, if you have to choose then I'd take WP with low-tech factions, and HGP with the high-tech ones.
When I said planned with police, I meant going to planned and stopping to build a unit per base for police, not police/planned. Sorry, that wasn't very clear! In detail, I was thinking of a 2120 FM to boost early science, and switching to planned around 2150, when you have the essentials down. Police/planned wouldn't be to my taste, though it would be kind of viable with the Gaians or CyC... hmmmm...
Post some of your save games, btw! 2125, 2150 and 2175 from a game would be very illuminating.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 10:52
|
#19
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brno, Czech Republic
Posts: 172
|
My sincere apologies to all for not posting those saves! I've been too busy playing SMAC to get around to it! :-) Above all I've been testing Curiosity's proposal "early" 2120 FM. (I'd call it "hyper-early...). Incidentally my verdict is: occasionally extremely useful, often very harmful. Having now actually seen such extremely early FM in practice, I really have to say that, except in some special cases, the need to convert your second citizen (let alone your first citizen, as is necessary after the soon-surpassed base limit) to a doctor until an RC can be built does more harm than the extra early science can provide. Generally, during the very early game you can gain (admittedly undirected) science fairly easily, but drone control without police is a pain, whereas over time the reverse becomes true. Thus (again, having actually tried it out with several factions) I'd limit this strategy to cases where you need some directed science (e.g. an island start, a start demanding war using Impact Rovers, crawlers to build an SP, etc.) more than easy drone control. The beginning, to me, is all about expansion, so the real question is: will I expand better by having new tech of my choice, or by actually being able to build my way out of a paper, er, I mean, by having the benefits of not using extremely early FM?
An exception to this is cases where one has more money than one knows what to do with and can thus just rush-buy RC's everywhere, but such cases are rare.
On the other hand, I have learned that in many cases (i.e. barring an early war), Lal and Domai were almost born for running FM as soon as possible.
Likewise, extremely early FM really does represent salvation for those hideous island starts -- the slowed initial expansion is meaningless, since at first you can't go anywhere anyway, and thus you are to a certain degree getting something for nothing. Considering that that "something" is mainly directed science, and that this is precisely what you need to leave the island, the synergy is very good.
Now on to kick myself into finally posting those games!
USC
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 11:40
|
#20
|
Warlord
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
|
Ah, would you believe I normally expand faster in early-FM than in planned or simple?
The first reason is - I don't build scout patrols. I call this the Crazy Eddie expansion but unless you're playing high native life then it can work well.
I also apply my energy credits carefully and micro intensively, so that the base (hopefully) only spends one turn at size 2.
This works better in some situations than others. For example, it works pretty badly at 3a.m. when you're out of coffee. You need to really pay attention for those first 40 turns. It's also degraded if you get lots of nutrient resources.
You can normally prevent worms calling by not moving through fungus squares, and only popping pods once you've built a base next to them (this ensures the result of a pod is always positive.) If they do appear then a terraformer can usually be stationed in the base before it attacks - a terraformer in a base has no combat penatly vs natives, for some bizarre reason.
If there's a lot of fungus around then I may comprimise by building a scout every 3-4 bases, and stationing it so that it can reach any of them in one turn. And of course, once I've got two or three trance scout rovers, well my empire's safe as houses!
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 13:32
|
#21
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 404
|
You do that in MP as well? Because if I saw that your empire would be gone before you could say "Scout Rover". Plus, when I do that worms always find their way to my bases and rip 'n tear. I do it with Morgan, Domai and Lal in SP. I'd probably concentrate on defending my borders in MP with Morgan, but build defense with Lal 'n Domai.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 15:33
|
#22
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Missouri / Misery; CC
Posts: 3,042
|
You MUST defend as little as possible in MP until given incentive not to, or you lose turn advantage. Your scout rover would be spotted by my sensors or terraformers before it could take a base, ideally, and even if it grabbed one, I could immediately construct defense in my vulnerable bases after that.
The exception is when someone hits you so early that you don't have formers and sensors, or expendable bases, as Curiosity demonstrated. He nailed my capital in 2115, coming from the direction I hadn't yet explored. That's just a risk you have to take.
As for worms, build sensors, and be careful when popping pods. If you lose some dinky base, oh well, make another. All your important bases should be shielded by new expansion.
Incidentally, I'm a big fan of hyper-early FM, excepting Zak (gets to Wealth by the time he has 40 energy), Dee, Yang, and sometimes Domai (+3 industry ROCKS, and you need the +2 growth to keep up).
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 16:19
|
#23
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 404
|
I'll take half your bases in one sweeping motion. After that you're screwed. Of course, careful terraforming would help. And keeping resources to speedbuild defense. Heck, if that's the way you run things I could just run a rover up to your front door, shout boo and you'd be screwed out of the game while desperatly trying to defend. You don't think I'm dumb enough to concentrate my forces at one spot early so you'll have an easy time defending?
Of course, I need to spot your weakness early. If you want to risk losing the game before 2150 to get turn advantage, by all means. I don't see how it's worth the risk. Worms and nasty people (like me) can screw you over too much. And I never rely on luck, it always fails on me.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 16:36
|
#24
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
If your entire strategy is founded on blundering into my undefended bases with 2-3 rovers, I don't see how you're relying on luck more than the guy who waits for attackers before building defenders. I've got sensors to see you from afar, and can cancel what I'm building in my border bases to rush-build some synth garrisons. If your offensive turns out to be too large to withstand, I'll sell off my upgrades and cut the roads leading to my other bases, and rely on the fact that I've still got 3-6 more bases built to keep you from consolidating your gains.
On the other hand, if you don't find me, you've blown all that early turn-advantage for nothing, and with IA safely under my belt, I'll be long-dogging it toward rushed wonders, tree farms and clean reactors.
It seems to me that the truly conservative approach is to expand naturally and explore aggressively. Once you've found your rivals and probe them, you can find out which faction is unprepared for your assault and build sufficent attack units to make the outcome of the engagement beyond doubt.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 17:42
|
#25
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Missouri / Misery; CC
Posts: 3,042
|
You won't take my bases so swiftly because I have sensors at the periphery. 1-2-1s or 1-3-1s in bases on sensors will slow you down greatly, and they can be rushed cheaply. Terraformers in bases with sensors hose native worms.
If you force me to build garrisons, you merely force me to return the turn advantage I had gained by skipping them. However, I'm returning it much later, so I'm coming out ahead anyway.
Worst case, you force me to struggle for survival. If there are more than two players in the game, everyone else pulls ahead while we pour resources into war. You lose. I lose.
If you find me far too late, I've pulled far ahead of you. You lose. I can win.
If you find me at an intermediate stage, you might convince me to help you out in exchange for not fighting you and falling behind. We both can win. This window is kind of narrow.
You can only win if you scout me out without tipping me off to your existence, and swarm me with rovers and probe teams. Better hope I don't stumble on you before you're ready.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 18:39
|
#26
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 404
|
Worms can come out of nowhere and smack your base.
Compare the cost of 3 scout rovers to rushing synthmetal in each base and you find out who comes out on top. Add any minerals you lose on changing production to defense. And if I can get my hands on even one base, I've gained from it.
Quote:
|
1-2-1s or 1-3-1s in bases on sensors will slow you down greatly
|
No, it will turn me around. Once you get them my objective is achieved, you've lost all the money you for some weird reason hadn't spent already. Mission accomplished, now they head to scare another sucker.
But if you can afford to rushbuild all that military, you don't have turn advantage. Spending your money gives you turn advantage.
But do you really think I rely on this in a game? This is just something to give me an edge. And if I happen to find a pair of unity rovers from pods, it doesn't even cost me anything. And it's not one of my most common strategies, since I rarely manage to find someone I feel I can screw over with this.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 19:30
|
#27
|
King
Local Time: 06:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A right bastard.
Posts: 1,058
|
I'd much rather sacrifice a turn's energy income on turn 40 than a 3-5 turn's mineral output on turn 20. Especially if it turns out you don't find me, which, on a huge map, is pretty likely. Yes, eventually I will have to build defenders, and I'll usually have them built in most of my bases by the time I've completely finished expanding.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 21:11
|
#28
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Missouri / Misery; CC
Posts: 3,042
|
Sensors see worms before they smack your bases. Forests clear fungus. Formers clear fungus. Formers are EVERYWHERE. Any worms that appear will kill a former first. After that, I simply move all the vulnerable formers out of the way, and into vulnerable bases. No, native life doesn't worry me (Exception: hordes of locusts produced by pops in certain conditions).
Gufnork, I think you underestimate my typical cashflow in the scenario you're proposing. I'm not sitting on a pile of cash. I might have 50 or so ecs unless I'm saving up for a project. But I'm making 20-40 on up a turn.
Your 3 scout rovers cost you ~60 minerals directly, plus the support or reduced former count. If they're unity rovers, obviously, this cost is negated, but then I have unity rovers, too.
When they reach me, if they're just scout rovers, they'll be greeted with scout patrols. Your rovers will have small areas that they threaten, given the amount of forest I like to plant. I can simply pop out scout patrols in the threatened bases at minimal cost. Worst case, in a fresh base I'll have 3 mins/turn, so a scout patrol would cost me 6/9 * 44 ecs = 30. Whoop-de-doo.
If you get your hands on a base, you probably obliterate it, because it's probably size 1. In doing so, you cut several percent off my size, but it's nothing irreplaceable. If you grab a size 2, it'll be a size 1 kept out of drone riots by the very unit that captured it. Size 1 bases in hostile territory aren't very productive, and leave you vulnerable to probe raping. In fact, I might even let you take one for that purpose.
Actually, another factor in this is whether the game is PBEM or TCP/IP. The sequence of builds and attacks varies.
TCP/IP: (Each player finishes construction), then (each player can attack)
PBEM (AFAIK): Each player (finishes construction then attacks)
with parens indicating grouping
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 22:10
|
#29
|
King
Local Time: 01:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Harrisburg,PA USA
Posts: 2,244
|
CT, you overstate the cost to rush build a scout patrol.
- The first 10 minerals of a facility cost 4ec/mineral.
- Construction may be freely switched, even from one category to another, up to 10 minerals.
Rushing the scout in the circumstances you describe above will only cost you 24 ec, if done correctly...set production to a facility...spend 24 ec to rush 6 minerals...change construction to the scout. The six minerals are not reduced by the switch. The scout completes the next turn, unless one of your forests is occupied or destroyed.
The only time this approach becomes problematic is in your HQ if you have already built all facilities for which you have the tech. All other bases can use 'Relocate HQ' as the facility to 'build'.
The move sequence you describe in TCP/IP depends on whether simultaneous moves are being used or not. If not, the only difference from PBEM in the sequence of play is that all the AI take their turns at the end of the game turn, at the same time as the native life.
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2003, 22:22
|
#30
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:09
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Missouri / Misery; CC
Posts: 3,042
|
Mongoose: you're correct about the scout patrol, of course. I'm not used to being able to profitably hurry one thing and switch to another.
I'm pretty sure that non-simult TCP/IP games still have all players complete construction before anyone moves. You can twiddle your cities before your turn comes up, and you can't change what they produce before your turn comes up, after the start of the turn. However, it has been a while since I played in these conditions. In simult TCP/IP, you complete construction even before comps/natives move, so if a mind worm or something appears next to your base, you can rush a defender. There's a nasty cost for this advantage, however:
PBEM: you complete construction, ecodamage causes a pop with worms, your units move and attack, remaining worms move and attack
TCP/IP: you complete construction, ecodamage causes a pop (not sure about the order of these first two), worms move and attack, your units move and attack
This has the important consquence that an empath scout rover is NOT adequate defense against huge pops in TCP/IP, whereas it is in PBEM.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09.
|
|