End-Of-Session Suggestion

cavebear · August 13, 2003, 19:15

Why do we end each session at the end of *our* turn? Why not end it after the AI civs have made *their* moves? That way, we would have a bit more up-to-date information on which to base our polls and discussions.

I can't see why that would be cheating in any way. Presidents have certainly stopped sessions in the middle of our turn when surprises came up. It would be very helpful to see when AI units wander onto a planned path of attack after we have planned our move. It kind of leaves the President having orders to carry out a plan and then having to improvise right from the first move. At least it would make the first move of a session a bit more certain.

CannonFodder · August 13, 2003, 22:13

I think that makes a lot of sense. It will give the people more of a chance to view the potential moves that we can make at the beginning of the next session.

shade · August 14, 2003, 09:49

ok, I'll try not to forget

.

Shade

atawa · August 14, 2003, 13:16

Sounds good to me

Ben Kenobi · August 14, 2003, 13:31

How long have we been playing Democracy games before this suggestion? One would think we had tradition barring the additional information.

I say go ahead, so long as our King can restrain himself from 'just one more turn.'

Hydey · August 15, 2003, 07:56

The king can save when he feels it is nessessary