|
View Poll Results: Best Ever Movie?
|
|
Citizen Kane (1st)
|
|
3 |
4.55% |
Godfather (2nd)
|
|
9 |
13.64% |
Shawshank Redemption (3rd)
|
|
8 |
12.12% |
Chinatown (4th)
|
|
4 |
6.06% |
Terminator II (5th)
|
|
6 |
9.09% |
Matrix (6th)
|
|
9 |
13.64% |
Braveheart (7th)
|
|
8 |
12.12% |
Fight Club (8th)
|
|
5 |
7.58% |
Casablanca (9th)
|
|
4 |
6.06% |
Gladiator (10=)
|
|
2 |
3.03% |
Star Wars V (10=)
|
|
3 |
4.55% |
The Usual Suspects (10=)
|
|
5 |
7.58% |
|
August 14, 2003, 09:20
|
#61
|
Deity
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 27,637
|
Braveheart!
__________________
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 09:46
|
#62
|
King
Local Time: 23:21
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Soul Survivor
decent list, but missing a lot of movies.....
and a few that shouldn't be there, matrix, fight club, gladiator..... all pretty good movies, but far from greatest movie ever
|
I had forgotten about Fight Club. It was good enough to at least be nominated for Best Picture.
Gladiator did win Best Picture. Not all on that list did.
Still, I voted for The Empire Strikes Back.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 10:39
|
#63
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109
|
Bah! No hitchcock movies (pycho, North by northwest), not Kubrick films (2001, Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Paths of Glory), no great Westerns like Good, Bad, Ugly, man, these kids today have no appreciation for film, if the Matrix is seen as some pinnacle, even of fun moviemaking (what about Jaws or Indiana Jones when it comes to fun?)
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 10:47
|
#64
|
Retired
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
Yes... no Hitchcock or Kubrick...
Kind of confirms the "beauty contest" nature of this competition
But knowing the average age of people on this site... no surprise
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 10:53
|
#65
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,264
|
So true, Ming. The truly tragic thing is that "Dumb and Dumber" got more votes than any Kubrick*, Hitchcock, Ford, or even Spielberg movie.
*I can't stand his films, but admit to their high quality... especially compared to D&D.
Last edited by JohnT; August 14, 2003 at 10:59.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 11:41
|
#66
|
Settler
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UChicago
Posts: 4
|
the poll is worthless
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 11:54
|
#67
|
Retired
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
Worthless... not at all. It shows which movies posters here found the most enjoyable to watch. Nothing wrong with that. I guess it comes down to the definition of "best movie"... what makes a movie the "Best"...
Citizan Kane is a great movie. It had many things that had never been tried before. It is a land mark classic.
But is it as exciting as the Matrix... no way. While I find Citizan Kane enjoyable to watch, and am totally impressed with what was done back at that time... and the political satire of the story... and even the surprise ending of the story... I will admit that the Matrix is probably more entertaining... But which is the better film... I would say CK for many different reasons...
I could come up with reasons to support every movie on this list (well, maybe not for Braveheart)... but I don't agree that this list represents the best of the best.
But that's just a matter of opinion
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 13:03
|
#68
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Ming
... but I don't agree that this list represents the best of the best.
|
You are absolutely right.... It needs something... something with skeletons and zombies and a guy with a chainsaw attached to his hand...
It needs a little Army of Darkness. (The name by itself blows the competition away: Evil Dead 3-Army of Darkness)
the thought of Army of Darkness in the same poll as Citizen Kane or the Godfather is funny... but if you're going to put Matrix and Braveheart in there, you might as well add it too...
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 13:04
|
#69
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,291
|
I agree with the people saying that the choices on this poll for best movie ever are mostly ridiculous.
Still, Chinatown.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 13:27
|
#70
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,264
|
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 13:49
|
#71
|
Settler
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UChicago
Posts: 4
|
well "Most Enjoyable To Watch" does not necessarily equal "Best Ever Movie".... and no matter what Gladiator can't compare to Citizen Kane, Shawshank or Chinatown
I'm not saying my opinion is better than someone else's..... wait, actually thats exactly what I'm saying
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 14:51
|
#72
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 350
|
I'd go with the first LOTR, which I think was better than many on the list.
First movie where I sat down in the theatre and was shocked, genuinely and pleasantly surprised, by how well it turned out. Great Flick.
__________________
"Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us." --MLK Jr.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 14:53
|
#73
|
King
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,595
|
This is going to be a tight race.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 15:03
|
#74
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: compensate this!!
Posts: 310
|
I am still puzzled by the Gladiator.
Why people like it? I simply don't get it, it's a unique film in that sense, I can somehow understand all of the other options on that list. It was hyped like crazy, everyone gave it 5 stars and when I saw it, It was the definition of mediocre. Nothing special, nothing very bad either. Only thing It had going on it was that it's movie about Gladiators since.... whenever (long time probably). Anyone care to comment? Maybe tell me what makes it so good? I have only seen it the one time at the cinema...
When someone invents a good idea and puts it on the big screen he also steals something away from the future moviemakers. Only one can be the first. Which movie is better, the one that had the original idea or the one that copies it and instead of ****ing it up actually makes a better version? Should I like the first more because I respect it more? And who did they rip the idea of in the first place anyway, some book? Also the trick is that the movie I see first will probably be my choice for the better one because it takes away something from the movie I see after it, unless the second one is much better.
So I think I'll have to agree, the more you enjoy the better it is.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 15:09
|
#75
|
Retired
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
|
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 15:45
|
#76
|
King
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,595
|
Quote:
|
I feel the same about the Matrix... fun to watch, nice special effects... but one of the top ten films of all time...
|
Blasphemer!
Last edited by Harry Seldon; August 14, 2003 at 16:09.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 15:46
|
#77
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,264
|
Quote:
|
Only thing It had going on it was that it's movie about Gladiators since.... whenever (long time probably).
|
Caligula, perhaps?
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 16:02
|
#78
|
Deity
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 27,637
|
Ming likes crap like "Children of The Corn".
Reminds him of the forum.
__________________
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 16:07
|
#79
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: topeka, kansas,USA
Posts: 8,164
|
Quote:
|
I thought that MOVIES with an "S" at the end was a pretty good indication that there needed to be more than one.
|
No no NO! You see, along with the new math comes the new english where adding an "s" to movie still means "movie".
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 16:09
|
#80
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by iamlod
You are absolutely right.... It needs something...
|
More Cowbell?
/Walken
And what's the deal with not a single Christopher Walken movie in the poll? The Deerhunter maybe?
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 16:10
|
#81
|
King
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,595
|
Why not Nick of Time or Suicide Kings?
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 16:41
|
#82
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New England
Posts: 3,572
|
Go godfather, GO!!!
__________________
"mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
Drake Tungsten
"get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
Albert Speer
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 22:26
|
#83
|
CTP1/2 GODDESS
Local Time: 07:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 10069
Posts: 198
|
Still FC, even though I saw it on VHS for $4.99 at a pawn shop, right next to "Pretty Woman." Hmm...there's an interesting juxtaposition.
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2003, 23:41
|
#84
|
King
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,824
|
What is Matrix doing in this poll? I mean, c'mon, it's got Keanu Reeves. Braveheart looks like the most decent film in the list.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 00:12
|
#85
|
King
Local Time: 17:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lundenwic
Posts: 2,719
|
This poll is sooo silly. No John Ford. No Preston Sturges. No Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Robert Wise, Kubrick, Hitchcock, Renoir, Lang, Ophuls, Sirk, in fact nothing that wouldn't have impinged on the consciousness of some whacked out Valley Girl (except perhaps Citizen Kane....).
No Indian films. No Chinese films. No German or Italian or French cinema represented.
And Braveheart!!!!! I've done more cinematic dumps!!!!
Star Wars!!!! Why not nominate 'the Jetsons', for Gawd's sake? Hmm, yes, the great acting range of Mark Hamill, from A to ...... A, and back again.
I understand. Films for grown ups like 'Culloden', 'The World of Apu' and 'L'Armee des Ombres' are just not as gee whizz bang as 'Braveheart' and 'the Matrix'.
__________________
Cherish your youth. Mark Foley, 2002
I don't know what you're talking about by international law. G.W. Bush, 12/03
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 01:46
|
#86
|
King
Local Time: 00:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Posts: 1,417
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by gunkulator
More Cowbell?
/Walken
And what's the deal with not a single Christopher Walken movie in the poll? The Deerhunter maybe?
|
A classic skit. I'm thinking perhaps it needs more cowbell.
__________________
He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 02:31
|
#87
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: topeka, kansas,USA
Posts: 8,164
|
I thought of nominating "The Great Dictator", that scene where Chaplin/Hitler is bouncing the balloon with the world imprinted on it is classic.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 03:30
|
#88
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: compensate this!!
Posts: 310
|
Quote:
|
I understand. Films for grown ups like 'Culloden', 'The World of Apu' and 'L'Armee des Ombres' are just not as gee whizz bang as 'Braveheart' and 'the Matrix'.
|
Grown ups, fashion snobs, what's the difference eh.
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 05:10
|
#89
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Posts: 956
|
What is it that some people don't like about Braveheart?!?
__________________
Quendelie axan!
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2003, 05:31
|
#90
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mad.
Posts: 4,142
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Verto
What is Matrix doing in this poll? I mean, c'mon, it's got Keanu Reeves. Braveheart looks like the most decent film in the list.
|
Don't blame me. Blame the people who nominated it.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21.
|
|