Thread Tools
Old September 2, 2003, 10:30   #61
Sava
PolyCast Team
Emperor
 
Sava's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: mmmm sweet
Posts: 3,041
Quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin


Those old people vote. In US politics Social security is called the 3rd rail (like the electric rail which powers street cars) because who ever touchs it is politically dead.
I think Social Security, as we know it, should be scrapped. I'd like to see Universal Health care, number one, but then, some sort of program or law that gives businesses more of an incentive to provide stable, reasonable pensions to people. Seniors and the disabled need to have a means of income or security in the event they cannot work. In order to keep costs down, we should investigate what they need money for... i.e. health care, housing, etc... The best way to cut costs is to get a hold of our health care industry and pharmaceutical companies who bilk seniors for billions.

edit: A question for conservatives... how do you propose we take care of our seniors and disabled if you get rid of Social Security? Is you solution just to get rid of it and let them die in poverty? Or do you have some other alternative?
__________________
(\__/) "Sava is teh man" -Ecthy
(='.'=)
(")_(") bring me everyone
Sava is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 10:40   #62
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
Really? Explain, please.
Social Security taxes more than it spends. The surplus goes directly to reducing the federal deficit. If you get rid of the system now, you would also get rid of the surplus in that account.

Quote:
We can't have the fiscal disipline your talking about if the rate of increase for social programs is always increasing.
Consider that revenue increases with the economy and with inflation. So right now, a 4%-6% increase every year would have no impact on how much of the economic pie the federal government constitutes. Anything lower than that figure, shrinks the government's piece of the economic pie.

If you were to manage a 2%-3% increase every year, and considering income tax bracket creep, you would end up back at balance in 5 or 10 years or so (depending on the economic cycles, of course). What Clinton did was to find that happy medium at 22%-23% of the economy while Bush is trying for 20% of the economy (or whatever). The difference in policies between the two is rather minute.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

Last edited by DanS; September 2, 2003 at 10:53.
DanS is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 10:49   #63
Defiant
King
 
Defiant's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 1,935
Quote:
Originally posted by Sava

edit: A question for conservatives... how do you propose we take care of our seniors and disabled if you get rid of Social Security? Is you solution just to get rid of it and let them die in poverty? Or do you have some other alternative?
What about this, we take that 7% FICA or whatever it is now and have the worker put it into a 401K type fund, it does two things, 1)invests into America, (the investments can be regulated, ie(no Janus 20), use a little more stable investment and 2) keeps the money out of the worst money manager in the world(the gov't).

Or are you going to assume Sava, that Americans are too dumb to control their own retirement destiny.
__________________
Lets always remember the passangers on United Flight 93, true heroes in every sense of the word!

(Quick! Someone! Anyone! Sava! Come help! )-mrmitchell
Defiant is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 14:51   #64
David Floyd
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
Quote:
edit: A question for conservatives... how do you propose we take care of our seniors and disabled if you get rid of Social Security?
I'm not a conservative, but I'll answer anyway.

It isn't my responsibility to take care of people who didn't save for retirement or for unexpected life events (ie, becoming disabled). They can take care of themselves, rely on their families, and take charity. If this means they end up dying in poverty, so be it.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
David Floyd is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 16:46   #65
MrFun
Emperor
 
MrFun's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,595
Quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin


Skip the relocation and go right to the sandbox.
Hey -- don't toast my creative solutions.
__________________
STFU and then GTFO!
MrFun is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 17:11   #66
Odin
DiplomacyNever Ending StoriesApolyton UniversityRise of Nations MultiplayerCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
Odin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally posted by Sava
One issue that has been overlooked here is the privatization of the military and how it has increased costs. The government outsources a lot of jobs to private firms that once used military personel. This has lead to a for-profit element that has crept into our defense spending in a big way. There was some discussion about it on MSNBC last week, but I regret I don't have any sources or figures.

Overall, there is government waste in every sector of government spending, that needs to be dealt with in a big way. I would create a commission of accountants to look at the entire budget and find government waste. Cutting spending without cutting the waste is a big mistake. Massive spending cuts are only going to hurt America. Instead, I would get more for our money, and make cuts in pork-related and corporate welfare programs.

I would also repeal the Bush-gift-to-the-rich-cuts, as well as instituting a progressive shift in the tax code, closer to pre-Reagan era (maybe 1950's-1960's) levels when America had a true progressive tax system. The burden should be put back on America's elite and taken off of the shoulders of the poor and middle classes. America was on the right track in the 1960's, but somehow, the junta of corporate scoundrels hijacked our country. The average net income for average workers in America has remained stagnant over 40 years, while income for the rich has increased dramatically. Everyone should be able to prosper in America, not just corrupt business leaders and those with wicked jump shots.


Kudos to slamming the libertarians and conservatives about the taxes.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com

The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
Odin is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 17:18   #67
Japher
Emperor
 
Japher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mu Mu Land
Posts: 6,570
Sava is a psycho!!! The problems of the many shouldn't rest on the shoulders of a few, that is how we got to where we are today!

Tuberski had it right on page 1: Cut funding to the NEA..

I'd go with giving Welfare the ol heave-ho as well.

I don't think we need to reduce spending, I think we need to cut programs out altogther...
__________________
Monkey!!!
Japher is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 17:43   #68
David Floyd
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
Quote:
Kudos to slamming the libertarians and conservatives about the taxes.
Umm, a lack of an income tax means that everyone benefits. Granted, some people don't benefit as much as when they get to steal the money of the rich, but you can't say that people don't benefit from a lack of income taxes.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
David Floyd is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 17:57   #69
Odin
DiplomacyNever Ending StoriesApolyton UniversityRise of Nations MultiplayerCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
Odin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd


Umm, a lack of an income tax means that everyone benefits. Granted, some people don't benefit as much as when they get to steal the money of the rich, but you can't say that people don't benefit from a lack of income taxes.
Not the Libertarian "tax is theft" BS. The richer you are the more responsibillity you have to people less fortunate or lucky as you. Most people are too greedy so that is where progressive taxes come in. If is wasn't for human greed and narcissism libertarianism would work, but it will never work in the real world.

Japher, Sava isn't a psycho, the libertarians are the psychos.

You can cut things as long it is not welfare, healthcare, education, or NASA.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com

The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
Odin is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 18:37   #70
David Floyd
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
Why should wealth = added responsibility?
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
David Floyd is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 19:24   #71
:) Smiley
Scenario League / Civ2-Creation
Emperor
 
:) Smiley's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: hippieland, CA
Posts: 3,781
Health care is outrageously expensive not because of an aging population or government mismanagement, rather horrific nutrition that puts 1/3 of our nation overweight and another 1/3 obese is to blame.
__________________
Visit First Cultural Industries
There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd
:) Smiley is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 19:45   #72
Odin
DiplomacyNever Ending StoriesApolyton UniversityRise of Nations MultiplayerCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
Odin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd
Why should wealth = added responsibility?
I would explain but you would ignore it as communist ranting, so what is the point when you are too thick-headed?

Rich people waste a lot of thier extra money on useless goods like $100,000 luxury cars and whatever instead of using it for the good of society.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com

The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
Odin is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 19:58   #73
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Quote:
Instead of using for the good of the society
Why is it my DUTY to work for the good of society? Someone pays me (will pay, whatever ) because I provide them a service: my labor. Why is the payment I recieve in return for my labor not mine to use as I wish? When I am BOUND to work for the good of "society", it is slavery. I do not own the fruits of my labor. There is no freedom, because anything that is mine is no longer mine - it is the property of others. "From each according to his ability; to each according to his need". So I am REQUIRED to give something to someone else simply because they have greater need of it?

I can accept it being a moral responsibility to help the community, but not it being a REQUIREMENT. That is just as bad as any religious fanatic - enforcing your strict moral code as law.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:04   #74
Imran Siddiqui
staff
Apolytoners Hall of FameAge of Nations TeamPolyCast Team
 
Imran Siddiqui's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
Quote:
I can accept it being a moral responsibility to help the community, but not it being a REQUIREMENT. That is just as bad as any religious fanatic - enforcing your strict moral code as law.
Well said. (though I back welfare for other reasons )
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Imran Siddiqui is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:08   #75
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Some welfare is okay. I can understand something in (small) moderation. However, the belief "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs" is, as I said, slavery.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:14   #76
Odin
DiplomacyNever Ending StoriesApolyton UniversityRise of Nations MultiplayerCiv4 SP Democracy Game
King
 
Odin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Liberal Socialist Party of Apolyton. Fargo Chapter
Posts: 1,649
I Know you Libertarians would say this. I hate libertarians because they act as if the poor can live of charity, GET REAL! Why should you be able to waste you money on a big new TV when a person is starving because he/she is only paid $4 per hour? Quit being so self centered, your lack of compassion and your social darwinism is sickening.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along: http://selzlab.blogspot.com

The attempt to produce Heaven on Earth often produces Hell. -Karl Popper
Odin is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:16   #77
Japher
Emperor
 
Japher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mu Mu Land
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Japher, Sava isn't a psycho, the libertarians are the psychos.


Quote:
I would explain but you would ignore it as communist ranting, so what is the point when you are too thick-headed?
Thank you for noticing and not spewing out your worthless bullsheit...
__________________
Monkey!!!
Japher is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:19   #78
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Quote:
Originally posted by Odin
I Know you Libertarians would say this. I hate libertarians because they act as if the poor can live of charity, GET REAL! Why should you be able to waste you money on a big new TV when a person is starving because he/she is only paid $4 per hour? Quit being so self centered, your lack of compassion and your social darwinism is sickening.
Why shouldn't I? I earned that money. Why should it be REQUIRED that I give it away? In fact, in this system, why should I work? If I don't work, I'll have a greater need, so I'll get things from those who do work... you see?
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:23   #79
Verto
Apolyton Storywriters' GuildNationStatesMac
King
 
Verto's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Why is it my DUTY to work for the good of society? Someone pays me (will pay, whatever ) because I provide them a service: my labor. Why is the payment I recieve in return for my labor not mine to use as I wish? When I am BOUND to work for the good of "society", it is slavery. I do not own the fruits of my labor. There is no freedom, because anything that is mine is no longer mine - it is the property of others. "From each according to his ability; to each according to his need". So I am REQUIRED to give something to someone else simply because they have greater need of it?


Because I work hard and manage to attain a certain level of financial success, I am obliged to take care of the rest of society?

Quote:
Why should you be able to waste you money on a big new TV when a person is starving because he/she is only paid $4 per hour? Quit being so self centered, your lack of compassion and your social darwinism is sickening.
Who are you to tell me what to do with my money? I will admit it is self centered, but you have no right to tell me what to do with my money.


Quote:
Rich people waste a lot of thier extra money on useless goods like $100,000 luxury cars and whatever instead of using it for the good of society.
And that 100,000 dollars goes to pay for the people who assembled that car. How is this not for the good of society? I am paid x number of dollars for the work I perform. When I use my money to purchase goods, I am paying somebody else for the work they perform.
Verto is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:26   #80
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Oh, and regarding the self-centered thing, maybe I agree! However, is it now illegal to be self-centered? Maybe it should be illegal to be rude, too! Or perhaps illegal to hold a grudge?

All of those things may be bad qualities, but BAD QUALITIES AREN'T ILLEGAL! Do you want everyone to conform and be exactly so?
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:33   #81
David Floyd
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
Odin,

Quote:
Rich people waste a lot of thier extra money on useless goods like $100,000 luxury cars and whatever instead of using it for the good of society.
Exactly right. their extra money. You hit on the operative phrase, on the first try even

Quote:
I Know you Libertarians would say this. I hate libertarians because they act as if the poor can live of charity, GET REAL!
I don't actually care whether or not the poor can live off of charity. Maybe some can, and maybe some can't. Maybe some have no family, no friends, and can't find a church. I'll feel bad for them, too. But does this make a bit of difference to me when I consider welfare? Absolutely not. My money is MY MONEY, and I should be able to do with it as I please.

Don't like it? You go earn your own money, then.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
David Floyd is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:34   #82
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Why does someone deserve something just because they need it? How does that work?!
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:35   #83
Verto
Apolyton Storywriters' GuildNationStatesMac
King
 
Verto's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,824
I wonder how Benjamin Franklin was able to survive without Social Security to take care of him...
Verto is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:38   #84
Japher
Emperor
 
Japher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mu Mu Land
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Rich people waste a lot of thier extra money on useless goods like $100,000 luxury cars and whatever instead of using it for the good of society.
That's why there is a "Luxury Tax"

In AMERICA ppl should be able to obtain and gain whatever they want...period
__________________
Monkey!!!
Japher is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:46   #85
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
I can accept it being a moral responsibility to help the community, but not it being a REQUIREMENT. That is just as bad as any religious fanatic - enforcing your strict moral code as law.
In the US, it's a very practical thing, having nothing to do with the ethics of forcing people to pay for things against their wishes. Because of the Great Depression, there's a thought that we have to moderate the variability in the growth of our economy by having the government be a larger proportion of total economic activity.

Since that time, the general rules of the economic game haven't changed. Any changes in the equation have been around the edges.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:47   #86
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
That is a completely different ballgame. If you can show me that by doing this I will profit in the long run, then sure.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:59   #87
David Floyd
Emperor
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Posts: 4,620
Quote:
That is a completely different ballgame. If you can show me that by doing this I will profit in the long run, then sure.
If you can show me that I will profit in the long run, I will consider volunteering to let you use my money. However, I will not consent to you taking my money without permission, just because you promise me I'll get more in the future.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
David Floyd is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 20:59   #88
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Over the long run we might be better off in as free of system as possible, but in the long run we're also all dead. We haven't had any depressions since our current system was put in place. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, they happened frequently.

We also haven't had as many big technological advances instituted during our time, even though I'm sure we're spending much more on R&D. I am amazed at what America did in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 21:06   #89
Japher
Emperor
 
Japher's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mu Mu Land
Posts: 6,570
DanS: I guess the computer industry and Internet exploding did nothing....

The whole welfare issue is a good example of why such things should be privatised... IMO, it is here that Libertarianist views could help..
__________________
Monkey!!!
Japher is offline  
Old September 2, 2003, 21:14   #90
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:06
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
DanS: I guess the computer industry and Internet exploding did nothing....
Compare to AC eletricity, the light bulb, flight, the automobile, skyscrapers, the telephone, phonograph, radio, etc. They did all of these things with a small fraction of our current population.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team