New Europe Steps Up - Page 3

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 15:30

Quote:

Originally posted by Zylka
Yeah, well according to you - I have a King's girth due to my ethnic background. IF ONLY IT WERE THAT EASY, BORIS

Hmmm, I don't recall ever asserting that Poles were ethnically prone to being well-hung...

chequita guevara · September 6, 2003, 15:33

Why are the backwards, feudalistic countries "new" Europe, while the modern capitalist countries "old" Europe?

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 15:34

Because we need someone like us when we fall.

Zylka · September 6, 2003, 15:35

Quote:

Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
JAHAHHAA ZYLKA COULDNT EVEN GET HIS PICTURE UP PEROPERLY HAHAHAHAHA

That's 0 for 2 buddy - what's up with you today? *Hands Tassy some relief Zyprexa

TCO · September 6, 2003, 15:37

Zylka has a pottymouth. But it's nothing compared to enlisted troops in maenevering bored out of their minds.

Zylka · September 6, 2003, 15:38

No Boris, but you can assert that we are the sexiest people on Earth. Heck, even Ms. Poland rocked the Poly beauty pageant some time ago!

TCO · September 6, 2003, 15:39

Quote:

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Why are the backwards, feudalistic countries "new" Europe, while the modern capitalist countries "old" Europe?

You mean the enui-laden types?

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 15:39

I wouldn't say sexiest on Earth. I mean, I've never seen quite a combo like German-Irish. Seeeeexy!

TCO · September 6, 2003, 15:40

hasselhof?

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 15:42

I don't know if he's part Irish. But even if so, there are always exceptions...

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 15:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Zylka

That's 0 for 2 buddy - what's up with you today? *Hands Tassy some relief Zyprexa

But I SAW Them

BUT THEY ARENT THERE ANYMORE

*Takes the Zyprexa, feels better*

St Leo · September 6, 2003, 15:51

Quote:

Originally posted by PLATO
If the rest of the world would wake up and understand that its about getting Iraq fixed and not about "standing up to the US" then everyone would be better off in the long run. France and Germany have simply lost their minds.

We are fixing Afghanistan. It needed to be occupied by the UN years ago when the Taliban first started violating fundamental human rights.

You deal with Iraq. It wasn't all that broken in the first place.

Provost Harrison · September 6, 2003, 16:08

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO

I heard that in Belgium all the people in the Army are unionized hairdressers (WSJ story). Maybe that is why you open your legs for the Germans every generation.

I should hope so, they wouldn't be much use if they were ionised hairdressers

TCO · September 6, 2003, 16:19

Quote:

Originally posted by St Leo

We are fixing Afghanistan. It needed to be occupied by the UN years ago when the Taliban first started violating fundamental human rights.

You deal with Iraq. It wasn't all that broken in the first place.

Yeah Iraq was just ducky. Saddam was really trustable.

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 16:21

Well, now that you think about it:

SADDAM: I have no weapons of mass destruction.
BUSH: He has weapons of mass destruction!!!

One was telling the lie, and it wasn't Saddam

So therefore Saddam is more trustworthy than bush. Though thats not hard to be.

TCO · September 6, 2003, 16:32

We went to war, not because of a missile on the launcher, but because of a systemic failure of Saddam to act peacefully. Exemplified by his secret weapons programs, kicking inspectors out, etc.

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 16:33

Keep revising, TCO, keep revising.

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 16:36

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO
but because of a systemic failure of Saddam to act peacefully.

I don't recall one war Iraq had other than with the US in the last ten years.

And no, thats not the reason. Condie said it was for the Iraqi people. Though Rummy said it was about WoMD....Who cares what he thinks?

Zylka · September 6, 2003, 16:42

Quote:

Originally posted by St Leo

You deal with Iraq. It wasn't all that broken in the first place.

Indeed, it was a lovely place. Did you ever catch wind of that article of a journalist's pass by a prison for orphans of Saddam's (and therefore "the peoples") enemies?

Snuggled firmly in Bagdhad as a reminder to other potential enemies, the smell in itself was enough to make journalists vomit. Kind of like a KFC advertising it's greasy scent throughout the air to draw customers - only using children in their own filth to intimidate

...but hey, that's just propoganda. Of course a country who would pull something as bat**** and backwards as this (even this to its own people) can still be good

Perhaps a naive little rich Canadian boy, agreed?

TCO · September 6, 2003, 16:42

I know this is hard for a civ-playing pea-brain to understand, but we went to war for more important reasons than a specific jug of chemicals.

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 16:49

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO
I know this is hard for a civ-playing pea-brain to understand, but we went to war for more important reasons than a specific jug of chemicals.

0/10. That was horrible for two reasons: 1. It wasn't even a valid insult. 2. It doesn't apply to me.

And your right, we did. Unless we find a jug full of chemicals. Then we went to war to save the world from Saddams WoMD

Face it. Republicans have been changing their story sooo much ever since we occupied Iraq.

Otherwise, it was (fill in here)

A: For the Iraqi people!
B: To save Iraqs neighbors.
C: ~~To destroy a terrorist haven.~~ (Invalid.)
D: ~~To rid Saddam of WoMD.~~ (Invalid.)

TCO · September 6, 2003, 16:50

Why even bother arguing with a kid who has a Stalinist Russian identity. communism is washed up. You're a joke.

realpolitic · September 6, 2003, 16:51

Quote:

Originally posted by PLATO
If the rest of the world would wake up and understand that its about getting Iraq fixed and not about "standing up to the US" then everyone would be better off in the long run. France and Germany have simply lost their minds.

Maybe if the Bushmen would wake up and realize they aren't licenced to rule the world, admit that they made a mess in Iraq, and hand over command to somebody other than Haliburton

, other countries would be willing to put their men at risk.

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 16:52

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO
Why even bother arguing with a kid who has a Stalinist Russian identity. communism is washed up. You're a joke.

You've been possessed by Odin!

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 16:55

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO
Why even bother arguing with a kid who has a Stalinist Russian identity. communism is washed up. You're a joke.

Can't debate the facts, so instead you resort to personal attacks

This debate was fun TCO, mainly beause you didn't really try to defend your position

Boris Godunov · September 6, 2003, 16:56

Quote:

Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar

B: To save Iraqs neighbors.

Actually, this one has been shot down as well, since our invasion proved that Iraq wouldn't have had the military might to successfully attack a paper bag.

realpolitic · September 6, 2003, 16:56

Quote:

Originally posted by TCO

Yeah Iraq was just ducky. Saddam was really trustable.

Saddam was even less trustable when the US supplied him with VX gas and trained him in the use of anthrax.

Nubclear · September 6, 2003, 16:57

While that may be true, in the American peoples eyes its still a valid excuse for war.

However, C and D aren't because they've been completly disproven. Any attempt to back it up results in a political loss.

Ted Striker · September 6, 2003, 17:02

Quote:

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
I wouldn't say sexiest on Earth. I mean, I've never seen quite a combo like German-Irish. Seeeeexy!

German and Irish?

That's like mixing lard with Crisco...

Ted Striker · September 6, 2003, 17:03

Quote:

Originally posted by St Leo

You deal with Iraq. It wasn't all that broken in the first place.

Yeah, widespread torture and oppression isn't that bad.