|
View Poll Results: What map size would you prefer?
|
|
Tiny
|
|
0 |
0% |
Small
|
|
0 |
0% |
Standard
|
|
1 |
4.17% |
Customized by CMN: somewhere between Standard and Large
|
|
3 |
12.50% |
Large
|
|
8 |
33.33% |
Customized by CMN: somewhere between Large and Huge
|
|
3 |
12.50% |
Huge
|
|
2 |
8.33% |
Customized by CMN: Huger than Huge!
|
|
3 |
12.50% |
Let a CMN surprise us!
|
|
3 |
12.50% |
Write-in
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
|
1 |
4.17% |
|
September 18, 2003, 15:23
|
#1
|
Local Time: 10:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
AC-Police State Game : map size
Another one of those traditional polls.
Seven days again.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 16:18
|
#2
|
Princess
Local Time: 02:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: falling, once again
Posts: 8,823
|
I haven't voted on this one yet. My question is do we want to meet our rivals later in the game when we have established solid advances in all areas before engaging in massive battles or do we want to fight it over from the beginning?
__________________
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 16:36
|
#3
|
Local Time: 08:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
Voted large. We want to expand first, but also meet people before 2150. Makes it more of a mixed game rather than just a builder.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 16:38
|
#4
|
Local Time: 10:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Good question. For me it depends on how much the AIs will be beefe up.
Ah yes, I'll post the map sizes. Perhaps they are a help for voters.
Code:
|
Tiny planet|(early conflict), 24, 48
Small planet, 32, 64
Standard planet, 40, 80
Large planet, 44, 90
Huge planet|(late conflict), 64, 128 |
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 18:39
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 10:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bubblewrap
Posts: 2,032
|
Standard.
We had just enough people tto run last DG, and now with the aquatic ability, we'll have more potential base sites, so a smaller map then last time seems in order.
I think we had large last game, so i'm voting Standard now.
__________________
<Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 18:56
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 18:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I am so out of touch
Posts: 1,660
|
I do wish we meet somebody within 40-60 years. Given that it would be sea map, and with foils, we could meet others much quicker than by land. Were this a land base I would hesitate having too large a map. But if this is a sea map than maybe a larger map may not be as much a problem.
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 21:51
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
large.
|
|
|
|
September 20, 2003, 07:15
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 9,541
|
Huge - even Ultra-Huge (foils traversing at 4 per turn will have a large world mapped out completely in less than 50 turns)
And disable the MCC (elite cruisers would have a 9-tile movement with the MCC)
G.
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2003, 05:19
|
#9
|
Warlord
Local Time: 09:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 234
|
Large seems nice for a sea/ocean-based game.
|
|
|
|
September 22, 2003, 22:39
|
#10
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
|
Large sounds good - we want some time alone to sort ourselves and our politics out, but we also want to meet others within a reasonable timeframe to condemn their Bolshevik panderings have meaningful discussions on political science.
|
|
|
|
September 23, 2003, 03:37
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 979
|
I'm kind of new to the ACDG and somewhat lurking... but er, put me down for large map! I'd go with huge or ultra-huge since I love epic games, but I understand it would get pretty boring in the beginning.
__________________
First Civ3DG: 3rd and 4th Term Minister of Public Works. | Second Civ3DG: First Term Vice President | ISDG: Ambassador in the Foreign Affairs Ministry | Save Apolyton! Kill the Off-Topic Forum!
(04/29/2004) [Trip] we will see who is best in the next round ; [Trip] that is why I left this team ; [Trip] I don't need the rest of you to win |
The solution to 1984 is 1776! | Here's to hoping that GoW's military isn't being run by MasterZen: Hehe! | DaveRocks! or something. ;)
|
|
|
|
September 23, 2003, 03:39
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Not to mention being a nightmare at the end. We had a Huge map last game, and moving all the units around at the end of the game was horrible...
|
|
|
|
September 25, 2003, 05:00
|
#13
|
Deity
Local Time: 20:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
|
And we weren't even properly warmngering!
|
|
|
|
September 25, 2003, 11:24
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 09:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Technical University of Ilmenau, Germany
Posts: 2,649
|
Between Standard and large. For the reasons given above.
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2003, 05:58
|
#15
|
Local Time: 10:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
So... large map or slightly above large map? Large is the most chosen option, but there are more people voting larger than large than smaller than large. When you calculate, the mean is somewhere in the middle between "Large" and "Customized by CMN: somewhere between Large and Huge".
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2003, 16:01
|
#16
|
Local Time: 08:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
Give the CMN this poll and tell him to follow it as best he sees fit I think Large, since the mean is closer to that than to between "large and huge" IIRC, and the latter means more work.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2003, 18:50
|
#17
|
Local Time: 10:56
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Quote:
|
I think Large, since the mean is closer to that than to between "large and huge" IIRC, and the latter means more work.
|
Good argument. I'll put "large map" in the thread of things already decided.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56.
|
|