 |
View Poll Results: Please pick the rules set you prefer:
|
|
|
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : YES
|
   
|
6 |
6.12% |
|
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : NO
|
  
|
20 |
20.41% |
|
Bell Curve: No random events : YES
|
  
|
5 |
5.10% |
|
Bell Curve: No random events : NO
|
  
|
19 |
19.39% |
|
Randomize Faction Leader Social Agendas: YES
|
  
|
8 |
8.16% |
|
Randomize Faction Leader Social Agendas: NO
|
  
|
16 |
16.33% |
|
Randomize Faction Leader Personalities: YES
|
|
8 |
8.16% |
|
Randomize Faction Leader Personalities: NO
|
|
16 |
16.33% |
|
September 18, 2003, 15:45
|
#1
|
Local Time: 12:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
AC-Police State Game : rules part 2
Part 2 of the traditional rules poll. Having witnessed two democracy game start-ups, I can more or less predict what rules set will be accepted, but let's poll it anyway. 
Seven day voting limit.
For reference: this is the first part of this rules poll.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
|
September 18, 2003, 16:47
|
#2
|
Local Time: 10:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
No on all, as if I need to say.
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 19, 2003, 03:38
|
#3
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
No to all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20, 2003, 07:19
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 9,541
|
Yes to all except the Bell Curve (which is good, as it tends to restrict the leading player who will usually be the human team)- makes for unpredictability, forces thinking "outside the box"
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20, 2003, 07:44
|
#5
|
|
King
Local Time: 20:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I am so out of touch
Posts: 1,660
|
Considering the number of experts here, maybe we do need a challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20, 2003, 19:05
|
#6
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
|
NO to No random events
YES to pods only at the crash site
YES to random personalities
How much difference does the personality make anyway? Aggressiveness sure, but shouldn't we be planning for that regardless of the faction? Random events ROCK, and pods can make things a lot easier. We should show we can beat it without that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20, 2003, 20:16
|
#7
|
|
Warlord
Local Time: 10:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Under Water Base near North Pole of Chiron
Posts: 112
|
Yes to pods only at crash site... I am looking for something different...
__________________
"War forced us into the seas. When we came back upon the surface, it was a ruined and desolate place. We knew that it was not long before even the most secluded spot in the seas of Earth was polluted, so we left to the the sea of stars. That is how we came to be on Chiron."
-Dameon McPherson, Leader of the Atlantians, "The Exodus"
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 22, 2003, 22:36
|
#8
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:07
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
|
C'mon people - don't vote default!
Vote for a challenge!
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07.
|
|
