Thread Tools
Old October 14, 2003, 15:06   #61
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
I just love it. Syria mobilizes for an attack on Israel, and the leftists here say "poor Syria." Syria is the aggressor here. They continue to wage war against Israel through terror. Now they are mobilizing.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 15:10   #62
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
why syria matters now to Israel

To recap - Israel, after the first intifida, determined that its best strategy was to withdraw from the territories (how much of the territories is a matter of controversy) and make peace with the Pals. the israeli govt in 2000 made an offer that almost all Israelis considered generous (some considered it too generous - probably a majority considered it just generous enough) Arafat not only rejected the offer, but launched a war (intifda 2) againt Israel (either cause he doesnt want peace at all, or wants it only as a result of victorious war, or cause he wants to use violence to improve the terms) This cause israel to turn away from the idea of negotiating with Arafat - the right and center to the idea that he can never be a partner for peace, and the left to the idea that a different partner would be preferable, if possible.

Now you dont have to agree with the above - many here do not - but that is largely the view of the most people in Israel.

Now since Abu Mazen was raised as a possible alternative leader. While views on him differed in Israel, from the far right opposing negotiating with him, to the right willing to negotiate but playing hardball, to the left eager to help him with concessions - all are agreed that he was unable to function because he was undercut by Arafat, Hamas and Islamic Jihad - apparently in concert. The same seems to be happening to Abu Ala.

Therefore, from the Israeli point of view, something needs to be done to weaken Arafat, Hamas, etc sufficiently to enable the peace process to take hold. The right would like to kill or expel arafat. The left would like to make unilateral concessions. The center position, holding the balance, is that neither of these are real options. (or at least that both have VERY substantial negatives) So how else can the Pal rejectionists be weakened? Well, it happens that Syria support Hamas and IJ - which increasingly cooperate with Syrian (and Iranian) backed Hezbollah. And presumably all are in league with Arafat. So the goal is to get Syria to stop supporting Hamas and IJ, and to at aleast reign in Hezbollah.

The military goal would therefore be to inflict enough pain on the Syrian state to get them to do this. Presumably ways can be found to do this that do NOT involve occupying any more of Syria. More likely aerial bombing of key targets. (Certainly any American who lived through the Clinton years of "pinprick aerial attacks" can understand the limitations of this strategy - Im not endorsing, just laying out the strategic rationale) The presumption is that SYRIA would attempt to make this a ground war, to counter the Israeli strategic bombing campaign - and would attack either in Golan, the Lebanese frontier, or both.

Given Israeli air superiority, and the demonstrated usefulness of tactical air power (for example in Operation Iraqi Freedom) its difficult to see how Syria could be militarily successful. Of course such a war would involve political costs for both the US and Israel - so the decision to launch it would depend on Syrian behavior, the course of events in the territories, Iraq, etc.

Given the currently VERY fluid nature of Palestinian politics, including the uncertainties surrounding Arafats physical health, it would seem foolish to launch such a war AT THIS TIME.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 15:10   #63
Eli
Civ4 SP Democracy GamePtWDG Vox ControliC4DG VoxCiv4 InterSite DG: Apolyton Team
Emperor
 
Eli's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Israel
Posts: 6,480
I dont think the report is real. If this was true, someone in the IDF would've leaked it already and the Israeli media would've done a huge mess out of it. Maybe there was some mobilization to anti-aircraft units, or unit "cores" in preparations for future escalations... but a 300,000 reserve mobilization cannot go unnoticed in Israel.
__________________
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.
Eli is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:35   #64
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
Are you guys suggesting that Israel will deliberately invoke a war with Syria by employing a sustained strategic bombing campaign?

What would be the targets?

So long as Israel attacks terrorist camps, bases and other assets, it maintains the high ground. If it begins to attack Sryian assets, it will lose the support of even the US.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:39   #65
axi
Prince
 
axi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 856
Quote:
I just love it. Syria mobilizes for an attack on Israel, and the leftists here say "poor Syria." Syria is the aggressor here. They continue to wage war against Israel through terror. Now they are mobilizing.
I won't repeat that if you get bombed, the reasonable thing to do is fight back. My problem is that the United States are helping Israel to draw Syria into war. My problem is that the US are destabilising whole areas of the globe, just to prove to themselves that they are doing enough about their so-called "war on terrorism". My problem is that they are pushing Syria, Iran and Northern Korea into war, that they can't just let them be. My problem is all that unwarranted agression that is upsetting the balances of decades. My problem is all the nitwits that play with global politics just like kids play cowboys and indians.

Pakistan tested one of it's new missiles yesterday. It has a 700km range and is capable of carrying nuclear weapons. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would have tens of millions of casualties. Such a war came close to happening in 2002, because of Kashmir.

But who gives a damn? The real baddies are all hiding in Damascus.
__________________
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell
axi is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:41   #66
DinoDoc
Civilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
DinoDoc's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Underwater no one can hear sharks scream
Posts: 11,096
Quote:
My problem is that they are pushing Syria, Iran and North Korea into war, that they can't just let them be.
How are we pushing any of these people to violent action?
__________________
Rosbifs are destructive scum- Spiffor
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
If government is big enough to give you everything you want, it is also big enough to take everything you have. - Gerald Ford
Blackwidow24 and FemmeAdonis fan club
DinoDoc is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:49   #67
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by Ned
Are you guys suggesting that Israel will deliberately invoke a war with Syria by employing a sustained strategic bombing campaign?

What would be the targets?

So long as Israel attacks terrorist camps, bases and other assets, it maintains the high ground. If it begins to attack Sryian assets, it will lose the support of even the US.
Im not suggesting that they would just go off like that. I am suggesting that they would raise the issue of Syrian support for Hamas, IJ, and Hezbollah with Syria, and with the US. And that a campaign starting with bombing terror camps might escalate. For example Israel has released a list of the homes and offices of the major terrorist leaders in Syria. All in central Damascus. I alsp assume that any such actions would not take place without consultation with the US.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:54   #68
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by axi

Pakistan tested one of it's new missiles yesterday. It has a 700km range and is capable of carrying nuclear weapons. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would have tens of millions of casualties. Such a war came close to happening in 2002, because of Kashmir.

But who gives a damn? The real baddies are all hiding in Damascus.
Yes, and we will do what we can to encourage a peaceful settlement of Kashmir. What exactly would you have us do wrt to India/Pakistan that we arent already doing?

Ultimately its up to INDIA and PAKISTAN to solve the tensions on the subcontinent, NOT the US. The US's interest is to - get this - stop terrorists who would attack American interests abroad and on US soil. Like Al- qaeeda for example. Now how Syria, iran and n korea play into this is debatable, and has been debated here, including on this thread. But i dont see how the subcontinents problems trump these concerns.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:58   #69
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
[QUOTE] Originally posted by axi


I won't repeat that if you get bombed, the reasonable thing to do is fight back. /QUOTE]

yup. The US got bombed by AL qaeeda. The main opertional leadership of Al qaeeda is now operating in Iran, and is directing terrorist activities in Iraq. Iran AND Syria support Hezbollah, which (as shown in the Washington Post quote above) is working with Al Qaeeda. Syria supports Hamas and IJ, which are blocking Israeli/Pal peace, and thus preventing the one thing that could do the most to reconcile the Muslim world to the US. North Korea is developing nuclear bombs, which it might very well sell to anyone, including terrorists.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 16:59   #70
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would have tens of millions of casualties. Such a war came close to happening in 2002, because of Kashmir.
Bush was the one who talked both sides down, you dumb ass.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:15   #71
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by GePap
An Israeli land assult straight into Syria is very unlikely, as it runs right into the bulk of the Syrian army fortwhith. Certainyl an air campaing could do a lot of damague quickly, but the Israelis till have to absorb the Syria attack on the heights, and attacks from Lebanon. And the US would not be getting involved at all.

Would Israel win? Ceartinly Would Israel win without significant cost to itself? NO. Becuase if the Israeli have nukes t keep the Arabs out of Tel Aviv, the Syrians have chemicals weapons waiting for anyone coming into Damascus. Lets put it this way: as much as people talk, the IDF is NOT as good as the US Army, and the Syrians are not as hapless as the Iraqis (at least they feed, clothe and arm their concripts).
Lets take as given that IDF doesnt match US armed forces, and that Syrian army is superior to Iraqi army. The Israelis wouldnt be planning on invading the country and taking the capital. They would have to "absorb the Syria attack on the heights, and attacks from Lebanon" as you correctly state. They would be fighting on the defensive, and Syria would have to attack, something which require both greater material advantage and greater initiative then defending. And they'd have to do this in the face of Israeli air superiority, both tactical and strategic. And while the US might not participate, its likely they would prevent any resupply for Syria via Iraq. Ditto for Turkey and Jordan. Syria is likely completly cut off from resupply.
Nah, the only deterrent is political. And that would, of course, depend on the circumstances.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:28   #72
axi
Prince
 
axi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 856
Quote:
Syria supports Hamas and IJ, which are blocking Israeli/Pal peace, and thus preventing the one thing that could do the most to reconcile the Muslim world to the US. North Korea is developing nuclear bombs, which it might very well sell to anyone, including terrorists.
Your reasoning is warped. A peace which would be humiliating to the Palestinians would not reconcile the Muslim world to whoever would enforce it. And I wonder how attacking yet another muslim country would be a reconciliatory move.

Regarding Korea: for all I know, the UK has nuclear weapons and would have about the same level of motivation as the DPRK to sell them to terrorists. Does this mean that I am justified to threaten them with war?

Quote:
Bush was the one who talked both sides down, you dumb ass.
Yet he is not so eager to enforce new sanctions against those countries, like he is with Cuba, Syria, Iran and the DPRK. Sanctions on Pakinstan were actually lifted prior to the |Afghanistan invasion, IIRC.
__________________
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell
axi is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:38   #73
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by axi


Your reasoning is warped. A peace which would be humiliating to the Palestinians would not reconcile the Muslim world to whoever would enforce it. And I wonder how attacking yet another muslim country would be a reconciliatory move.
and presumably what abu mazen and Abu ala want to negotiate is not a humiliating peace, but one with mutual benefits. Of course if you think that that Arafat wanted to stop abu mazen from making a humiliating, unjust peace, and that Hamas and IJ and Syria were helping him to stop such humiliation, he can see why youd think attacking Syria would be a bad idea. I hope you can realize that Israel and the US dont share your point of view.
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:40   #74
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
Yet he is not so eager to enforce new sanctions against those countries, like he is with Cuba, Syria, Iran and the DPRK. Sanctions on Pakinstan were actually lifted prior to the |Afghanistan invasion, IIRC.
As they were with India. Would you have done otherwise?
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:42   #75
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by axi


.

Regarding Korea: for all I know, the UK has nuclear weapons and would have about the same level of motivation as the DPRK to sell them to terrorists. Does this mean that I am justified to threaten them with war?
The US does have nuclear weapons. The UK does not share the motivations for sale, as the UK is not an economic basket case like North Korea. North Korea has attempted to ship long distance missiles to Iran, IIUC, and has attempted to ship illegal drugs overseas.

I was going to mention the sanity of the North Korean leadership, but then i might get snarky comments about Tony Blair and Dubya as a response.

You dont really want me to start posting statements from North Korea, now do you?
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:43   #76
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
Israel is not going to launch any massive land attack on Syria. Assad's legitimacy depends upon the Arab world seeing him as being the only "strong" Arab leader who's willing to stand up to Israel. Since Assad knows he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell in a war against Israel he will instead call up reserves, talk belligerently, and prognosticate about how evil Israel brutally attacked the poor innocent people of Syria.

That's about all he can do.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:47   #77
lord of the mark
Deity
 
lord of the mark's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,160
Quote:
Originally posted by DanS


As they were with India. Would you have done otherwise?
Of course he would have. Why did we need to lift sanctions against pakistan? Only to invade afghanistan, an imperialist war to build a natural gas pipeline from central asia. The way to deal with al qaeeda was a police matter, just call your local 911 service (hey, 911, ah) and get the coppers on it. so what if the coppers cant get into taliban ruled afghanistan? Just send a subpoena, right? Besides, its all OUR FAULT the taliban was even in power - ergo we had no right to overthrow them - 9/11 (and even worse followups) is our just desserts for overthrowing the progressive regime in afghanistan, and thereby bringing down the even more progressive regimes in eastern and central europe.

Why is this so hard to understand?
__________________
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
lord of the mark is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:50   #78
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
LotM: Sadly, many many people think like that.

People often see what they wish to see and not how things truly are.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 17:53   #79
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
is our just desserts for overthrowing the progressive regime in afghanistan
justice? no. Something that you've screwed up, and then bit you back in the ass? yes.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 18:00   #80
chequita guevara
ACDG The Human HiveDiplomacyApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
chequita guevara's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Fort LOLderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Posts: 9,091
Quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
LotM: Sadly, many many people think like that.

People often see what they wish to see and not how things truly are.
And those people are called Americans.
__________________
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
chequita guevara is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 18:09   #81
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Quote:
Only to invade afghanistan, an imperialist war to build a natural gas pipeline from central asia.
So now Afghanistan was all about the oil?

Despite the vast bipartisan support for the war, and the fact that the people who bombed the WTC were being protected by the Taliban? Seriously, since when has the legitimacy of the Afghanistan war been questioned?

Quote:
overthrowing the progressive regime in afghanistan
WHAT?! You are really off your rocker if you call a totalitarian fanatical religious state "progressive".
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 18:15   #82
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
WHAT?! You are really off your rocker if you call a totalitarian fanatical religious state "progressive".
I guess he was cynically referring to the pro-soviet regime there, which the americans helped to overthrow, by assisting religious drug trafficking warlords mujahedeen freedom fighters.
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 18:15   #83
axi
Prince
 
axi's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 856
Quote:
I hope you can realize that Israel and the US dont share your point of view.
As a matter of fact they don't share the point of view of the rest of the world.

Quote:
thereby bringing down the even more progressive regimes in eastern and central europe.
So you say Yeltsin was more progressive than Gorbatchev?
__________________
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell
axi is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 18:17   #84
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Quote:
I guess he was cynically referring to the pro-soviet regime there, which the americans helped to overthrow, by assisting religious drug trafficking warlords mujahedeen freedom fighters.
Yep, the Soviets were such wonderful people, weren't they? What a paragon of freedom and democracy. Unlike the evil totalitarian US.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 19:24   #85
Az
Emperor
 
Local Time: 13:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: A pub.
Posts: 3,161
Quote:
Originally posted by skywalker
Quote:
I guess he was cynically referring to the pro-soviet regime there, which the americans helped to overthrow, by assisting religious drug trafficking warlords mujahedeen freedom fighters.
Yep, the Soviets were such wonderful people, weren't they? What a paragon of freedom and democracy. Unlike the evil totalitarian US.
So now you're telling me that the US wanted to establish a US style regime there?



Well, if those Warlords the US detests so much right now is your idea of freedom and democracy...
__________________
urgh.NSFW
Az is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 19:26   #86
Kuciwalker
Deity
 
Kuciwalker's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
Not my point. You were praising the previous regime. Just because something is an alternative to something bad doesn't make it good - in fact, it could be worse.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
Kuciwalker is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 21:23   #87
GePap
Emperor
 
GePap's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109
Were to start:

First things first: Israel would not Invade Syria, so any major groundwar would most likely be started by the Syrians, and they would have Lebanon on their side.

Yes, the Syrians would lose, but:
1.People overestimate the damage airpower would do to ground forces, just like people did in 1991. Most damage to the Syrians woiuld NOT come from the air, but the ground. Syria and Lebanon based forces can hit some orthern Israeli cities, like Haifa, and certainly most towns up there. They can also hit all of Israel with Ballistic missiles. So even if the military campaing were quick, lets say as quick as the Iraq war, that gives the Syrians at least 1 week to shell israel, and no, Israel could not retaliate to such attacks with WMD's: thus the cost to israel of any coming war with Syria would, in terms of human lossses, certainly overshadow the last 2 years of violence with the Pals, plus such violence with the pals would continue as the war went on.

2. Israel wouolpd have to at least occupy southern Lebanon again. And perhaps even Damascus for a short time. israel has a poor tract-record when it come to occupying lots of Arabs.


Everyone quickly went to recite military stats..but the one thing no one has said is: what happens the day after? LoTM seems to think the road to peace with the pals lies through Damascus (or at least thinks some Israelis see this as a serious arguement). Well, sorry, it doesn't. If anything, an israeli victory might bolster the islamist militants and make peace even harder to come. For the point I made that everyone ignored is that NONE of Israels military vicotires have actually imrpoved it's overall strategic position or brought peace. Only when an Arab neighbor felt they could move (like Egyp, with some pride restored after 1973) did peace come, and with a lot of US money. Victory over Syria again would not do it, for Israel could do nothing but return to its borders at the end (and if a democratic Syrian gov came into being, give up Golan Heights..) and none of the more fundamental underlying cuases would have shifted.
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
GePap is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 23:24   #88
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
People overestimate the damage airpower would do to ground forces, just like people did in 1991.
Dude, you're on crack! The Iraqis were drastically demoralized if not bloodied in '91 by airpower. They were broken by airpower.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 23:28   #89
PLATO
Apolyton Storywriters' GuildGalCiv Apolyton EmpireCivilization III PBEMC3C IDG: Apolyton TeamCivilization III Democracy GameCiv4 SP Democracy GameThe Courts of Candle'BreC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogC4DG The HordeC4WDG éirich tuireannC3CDG Blood Oath Horde
Emperor
 
PLATO's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Occupied South
Posts: 4,729
With complete air superiority and the concept of the "kill box", Syria's armour would be broken before contact with Israeli Armour. Israel appears to have the capacity of gaining total air auperiority within hours of the beginning of a conflict.
__________________
Favorite Staff Quotes:
People are screeming for consistency, but it ain't gonna happen from me. -rah
God... I have to agree with Asher ;) -Ming - Asher gets it :b: -Ming
Troll on dope is like a moose on the loose - Grandpa Troll
PLATO is offline  
Old October 14, 2003, 23:43   #90
Joseph
King
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:31
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ca. USA
Posts: 1,282
Keep this thread going guys. It's good reading.
I'm not a betting man, but this time, I would go with Israel.
Joseph is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team